Standards and guidelines (DIN, ISO, ANSI etc.)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Marcis Rancans
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the distinction between standards and codes in the context of building a car, particularly regarding safety regulations like the requirement for brakes. It clarifies that standards are generally optional guidelines, while codes are enforceable laws adopted by governmental bodies. Standards provide detailed instructions for compliance with codes, which can vary by jurisdiction. The conversation highlights that while not following standards may not lead to legal penalties, it can result in professional consequences, such as losing a job for not adhering to accepted practices. Additionally, the discussion touches on the implications of international alliances, like the EU, on the adoption of codes, noting that localities may have their own codes that exceed national requirements.
Marcis Rancans
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Lets say I want to build a car. There are national and international standards regarding quality and specifications what I should follow, which say,for example, that I have to have brakes in my car.
So logically I suppose it is obligatory to follow standard and without it they wouldn't let me build this car for clients. But is it so?

Remember from lectures professor saying that standards are optional...but it doesn't make sense then...
Can someone clarify me who provides must-follow rules, and who provides optional guidelines ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Personally I would prefer car without breaks.
 
Borek said:
Personally I would prefer car without breaks.
Haha, let's make fun of a mistake ... any useful comments?
 
Have you researched your problem?
How about using common sense? (think EPA and volkswagen for a concrete example)
 
It's standards and codes, not standards and guidelines. Standards are guidelines. Codes are the law. Note however that sometimes code agencies adopt standards as their codes.
[edit]
For example, here is a list of New Jersey's adopted codes:
http://www.state.nj.us/dca/divisions/codes/codreg/#1

At least one, ASHRAE 90.1, is a standard adopted as a code.

...Hmm...NFPA's website doesn't say it that way, but I'm not sure I've ever heard of a code not being the law:
  • A code is a model, a set of rules that knowledgeable people recommend for others to follow. It is not a law, but can be adopted into law.
  • A standard tends be a more detailed elaboration, the nuts and bolts of meeting a code.
http://www.nfpa.org/press-room/reporters-guide-to-fire-and-nfpa/about-codes-and-standards

Considering that the laws of the US are titled "The US Code", that seems incongruous...
[edit2]
The world makes sense again:
  1. Definition of a Standard
A standard consists of technical definitions and guidelines that function as instructions for designers/manufacturers and operators/users of equipment...
  1. Definition of a Code
A code is a standard that has been adopted by one or more governmental bodies and is enforceable by law.
http://www.cstools.org/WritingGuide...and_Standards_-_Definitions_&_Requirments.htm
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Marcis Rancans
JorisL said:
Have you researched your problem?
How about using common sense? (think EPA and volkswagen for a concrete example)
Nice explanation! You should be a teacher! :D

russ_watters said:
It's standards and codes, not standards and guidelines. Standards are guidelines. Codes are the law. Note however that sometimes code agencies adopt standards as their codes.
Thanks!
But the rest is correct, right? ...1) standards are in general optional -> nice-to-have 2) all the laws give government regarding must-have technical requirements
Code agencies - you mean government and/or its institutions? What happens for example if a country is in alliance for example EU ... it automatically means that EU codes must be followed?
 
Marcis Rancans said:
1) standards are in general optional -> nice-to-have
Yes, optional in the sense that you won't get arrested/fined for not following them. But you might get fired because the standards are what has been accepted as good practice.
2) all the laws give government regarding must-have technical requirements
Code agencies - you mean government and/or its institutions? What happens for example if a country is in alliance for example EU ... it automatically means that EU codes must be followed?
Yes, code agencies are government institutions. But being in the US, I'm not sure about EU codes. There is a unified set, but I'm not sure about their adoption. More info can be found on it here though: http://www.eurocodes-online.com/en_US/en/about-the-eurocodes/legal-situation-per-country.html

In addition, most localities have their own additional codes and a legal provision that basically says the code enforcer can demand whatever s/he wants above and beyond the published codes.
 
  • Like
Likes Marcis Rancans
Thank you, russ_watters!
 
Back
Top