Standing Wave Equation: Exploring Y = 2Asin(\omegat)cos(kx)

AI Thread Summary
A standing wave is formed when two waves of the same frequency travel in opposite directions, represented by the equation y = y1 + y2. The resulting wave can be simplified using trigonometric identities to yield y = 2Asin(\omegat)cos(kx). However, this leads to confusion regarding the presence of antinodes at x = 0, which seems incorrect for a string. An alternative equation, y = 2Acos(\omegat)sin(kx), appears more intuitive for strings. The discussion ultimately clarifies the preference for one equation over the other, with the original question resolved by the user.
j-e_c
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
My lecturer said that a standing wave is formed when two waves that travel in the opposite have the same frequency.

He said that if the waves are y1 and y2, then the resulting wave y can be given as the sum:

y = y1 + y2.

y = Asin(\omegat - kx) + Asin(\omegat + kx). (1)

Where the plus and minus kx denotes their direction.

However, when (with a bit of trigonometric identity work) equation (1) is simplified it gives:

y = 2Asin(\omegat)cos(kx).

But how can this be? I mean, if x = 0, then the equation tells us that there is an antinode, which (for a string) isn't true.

I've seen the equation y = 2Acos(\omegat)sin(kx), which makes more sense when I consider a string for example.

To get to it you need the equation

y = Asin(kx - \omegat) + Asin(kx + \omegat) (2)

My question is, why would you use equation (2) and not equation (1)?

Thank you in advance for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's OK, I've solved it now.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top