State Function Conditions in Isothermal, adiabatic

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conditions under which the change in enthalpy (ΔH) is zero in isothermal and adiabatic processes, particularly focusing on reversible and irreversible scenarios. Participants explore the relationships between enthalpy, internal energy, and free energy in these contexts, as well as the implications of heat transfer and entropy changes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why ΔH is zero in isothermal and reversible conditions, noting that they understand ΔU being zero but are unclear about ΔH.
  • One participant suggests that ΔH should also be zero in adiabatic and irreversible conditions, arguing that since ΔH = dq/T, it follows that if there is no heat transfer, ΔH must be zero.
  • Another participant clarifies that in an isothermal process, there is a non-zero change in entropy, which contradicts the idea that heat flow is zero.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between ΔG and the conditions of reversibility and isothermality, with one participant providing a mathematical expression for ΔG in terms of enthalpy and entropy.
  • One participant presents a formula for ΔH in isothermal conditions, asserting that since there is no change in temperature, ΔH must equal zero, while another participant challenges this by stating that ΔH should equal q.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the conditions under which ΔH is zero, particularly in isothermal and adiabatic processes. There is no consensus on the implications of heat transfer and the definitions of state functions in these scenarios.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the importance of distinguishing between reversible and irreversible processes when discussing changes in entropy and enthalpy. There are unresolved mathematical steps and assumptions regarding the definitions of state functions and their applicability in different thermodynamic processes.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and professionals interested in thermodynamics, particularly those exploring the nuances of state functions and their behavior under various thermodynamic conditions.

cns
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
In an Isothermic and reversible condition why is DH=0? (D=delta) I can understand that DU=0 but DH? but why would DH not change?

DH should also =0 if it was an adiabtic and irreversible condition? since DH=dq/T -> as long as there is no heat transfer DH=0?

Since it's reversible would DG=0? or is it because it's isothermal? how would DG change for adiabatic, isochor, isobaric condtions?

Thanks so much
 
Science news on Phys.org
cns said:
In an Isothermic and reversible condition why is DH=0? (D=delta) I can understand that DU=0 but DH? but why would DH not change?
Do you mean an isothermic and reversible process? [itex]\Delta H[/itex] is usually used for change in enthalpy. Do you mean enthalpy or entropy?

If the process is isothermal, there is a non-zero change in entropy. This is because dU = 0 so dQ = dW = PdV which must be non-zero in a reversible process. so dS = dQ/T <> 0.

DH should also =0 if it was an adiabtic and irreversible condition? since DH=dq/T -> as long as there is no heat transfer DH=0?
In an adiabatic reversible process, there is no heat flow so dS = dQ/T = 0. If the adiabatic process is not reversible, there is a change in entropy. This is because entropy is a state function that is determined by taking the integral of dS over the reversible path between two states. (If the path actually taken is an irreversible adiabatic path, the reversible path from the beginning state to that end state will not be adiabatic - heat will flow so ds<>0).

Since it's reversible would DG=0? or is it because it's isothermal? how would DG change for adiabatic, isochor, isobaric condtions?
What is dG?

AM
 
sorry, I should have defined them

dH= Enthalpy
dG=free energy

My main question is why is DH=0 when you have an isothermal and reversible process against an external pressure of 1 atm?

thanks
 
cns said:
In an Isothermic and reversible condition why is DH=0? (D=delta) I can understand that DU=0 but DH? but why would DH not change?
The heat flow is not zero in a reversible isothermal process. Why do you say it is?

DH should also =0 if it was an adiabtic and irreversible condition? since DH=dq/T -> as long as there is no heat transfer DH=0?
As I explained in my earlier post and in https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=2959987&postcount=4", [itex]\Delta H[/itex] is zero in an adiabatic process, whether it is reversible or irreversible. But we calculate change in entropy [itex]\Delta S[/itex] always along the reversible path between two states. If the actual adiabatic path between two states is not reversible, the reversible path between those two states will involve heat flow, so dQ/T is going to be non-zero.

AM
 
Last edited by a moderator:
cns said:
Since it's reversible would DG=0? or is it because it's isothermal? how would DG change for adiabatic, isochor, isobaric condtions?

G = H - TS = (U + PV) - TS, so

[tex]dG = dU + PdV + VdP - TdS - SdT[/tex]

If the process isothermal and isobaric, then dP = dT = dU = 0, so

dG = PdV - TdSSince dS = dQ/T,

For a reversible isothermal path between the two states, it follows that

[tex]\Delta Q = T\Delta S[/tex]

For an isothermal and isobaric path between two states dU = 0 so, from the first law, [itex]\Delta Q = P\Delta V[/itex]

So if the path is reversible, isobaric and isothermal:

[tex]P\Delta V - T\Delta S = 0[/tex]

Since [itex]\Delta G = P\Delta V - T\Delta S[/itex], [itex]\Delta G = 0[/itex] for a reversible isothermal and isobaric process.

AM
 
Thanks Andrew,

This is the proof in my book for isothermal conditions for why DU and DH = 0

DH=n*Cp*ln(v2/v1)*(T2-T1)

since no change in temperature DH = 0

Is this correct?

because I thought the DH = q so DH shouldn't = 0.

thanks again
 
Perhaps you could show us the entire proof. Thanks

AM
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
8K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K