Static Equilibrium: Why Ethelred Gets the Short End of the Pole

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysicsKid0123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Static
AI Thread Summary
Ethelred is at a disadvantage because the boar's center of mass is closer to him, requiring him to exert a greater force to maintain equilibrium. This imbalance means that while both individuals are carrying the pole, Ethelred must apply more effort than necessary. The discussion emphasizes that even if no work is done in a static situation, the force distribution affects the physical strain on each person. Understanding the equilibrium equations clarifies that the distribution of weight impacts the forces exerted by each individual. Ultimately, this scenario illustrates the importance of load distribution in physical tasks.
PhysicsKid0123
Messages
95
Reaction score
1
It is a thousand yeas ago. You, along with your friend king Ethelred the Unready, have been hunting wild boar. You've had good luck; you shot a 150 lb boar. Now the hard part; you have to carry it back to the castle several furlongs away. Fortunately you have some rope and an 8 cubit pole. You will suspend the boar from the pole and the two of you will support the pole on your shoulders. Ethelred will support the front of the pole; you will support the back. You convince Ethelred that the boar should not be suspended right in the middle of the pole, but for better steering of the pole the boar should be suspended closer to Ethelred than to you. In a single well written paragraph, using physics, explain why Ethelred is getting a bad deal.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, we aren't going to write the paragraph for you, or do the physical calculations.
 
I need someone to check my answer: "W = F *d where d is the distance to the center of mass of the system. since the center is closer to him, he will have to apply a greater force in order to do the same work as yours. This is just like using a wedge to lift something. If you use the wedge, you will need a much less force to lift it than you would need if you are doing it by lifting it with no wedge."

This right?
 
You can't use the work analogy because no work is being done . Try using the equilibrium equations to determine who applies the greater force , and write the sentence accordingly.
 
PhanthomJay said:
You can't use the work analogy because no work is being done . Try using the equilibrium equations to determine who applies the greater force , and write the sentence accordingly.
I'm sure you're right in terms of what's wanted as the answer, but it's interesting to ask why it matters if no work is being done. In practice, work is done. You cannot even hold up a heavy object, let alone walk carrying it, without doing work, and the greater the force needed, the more work. The effective distance, in the W=Fd sense, probably does not depend on F.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top