Static Friction and Centripetal Force

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the role of static friction in providing centripetal force for a car moving in a circular path. Participants explore the distinction between static and kinetic friction, the conditions under which each applies, and the implications for a car's motion on a curve.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about why static friction, rather than kinetic friction, provides centripetal force for a car moving in a circle.
  • Another participant asserts that if static friction were not present, the car would slide, emphasizing that static friction has a maximum value that, if exceeded, results in sliding.
  • A participant questions whether static friction opposes the motion of a car on the highway, suggesting that kinetic friction might be more applicable since the car is in motion.
  • There is a query about why the wheels of the car do not provide centripetal force directly.
  • One participant explains that while tires are spinning, they are not sliding, and thus static friction is at play, contrasting this with scenarios where kinetic friction occurs, such as when a car spins out of control.
  • A participant reiterates the distinction between static and kinetic friction, noting that the contact patch of the tires does not slip, which is why static friction is relevant.
  • Another participant discusses the brief contact between the tire and road surface and questions whether turning the wheels allows static friction to provide centripetal force.
  • There is a suggestion that turning the wheels changes the instantaneous velocity of the car, allowing static friction to act as the centripetal force.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the roles of static and kinetic friction, particularly in relation to a car's motion. There is no consensus on the nuances of how these forces interact in the context of centripetal force.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of relative motion between surfaces in contact and the conditions under which static or kinetic friction applies. The discussion does not resolve the complexities of these interactions.

Sammy101
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am very confused. I have searched everywhere online and have drawn free-body diagrams, but I am still confused as to why static fricition, not kinetic friction, provides the centripetal force in a car moving in a circle.

In addition, assuming that the centripetal force of a car moving around a circle is static friction, then you can find the maxium velocity that you can travel without going tangent to the circle, but can you travel at a slower velocity than this maxium velocity? Your centripetal force would change and no longer be equal to the static friction. How does this work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If it was not static friction, then the car would be sliding around. Dont forget, static friction is an inequality, so you can go up to a maximum value, but once you go over that velocity the friction will no longer be static and the car will begin to drift or slide.
 
So when a car is normally driving on the highway is static friction the force that is opposing the motion of the car since it is not "sliding?" I always thought that this was kinetic friction. To me, the car is moving so kinetic friction seems to be what would oppose the motion here.
 
Also why do the wheels of the car turning not provide the centripetal force?
 
The tires are spinning but nothing is sliding. When you travel in a circle, your tires are spinning in the direction of motion, but the friction is in direction of the centre of the circle. So the tires would have to slide perpendicular to the motion to have kinetic friction. if that happened, you wouldn't be traveling in a circle anymore.

When race cars are racing there is no kinetic friction, but when some guys spin out of control, that's kinetic friction.
 
Sammy101 said:
So when a car is normally driving on the highway is static friction the force that is opposing the motion of the car since it is not "sliding?" I always thought that this was kinetic friction. To me, the car is moving so kinetic friction seems to be what would oppose the motion here.
What matters is whether the surfaces in contact are in relative motion--sliding or slipping. While the car is certainly moving, the instantaneous contact patch of the tires on the road is not. So, no slipping and thus static friction. (Friction opposes slipping between surfaces, not 'motion' in general.)
 
When you hear tires screeching, that's kinetic friction. When no screeching, it's static (for the most part). The car might be moving relative to the pavement, but the contact surfaces aren't.
 
Is it static because the tire and the wheel are only in contact for a split second, and then the two surfaces are no longer in contact and of course cannot be moving relative to each other if they are not in contact?

And when a car turns its wheel to go around a curve, static friction provides the centripetal force. Does turning the wheels in a curve simply allow for static friction to provide the centripetal force?

Because I having been trying to figure out why a cars wheels and engine do not simply provide the centripetal force. But I think it is like I said above that the turning of the wheels allows for the static friction to provide centripetal force. Is this right?
 
Sammy101 said:
Does turning the wheels in a curve simply allow for static friction to provide the centripetal force?

well turning the wheels causes the instantaneous velocity of the car to be in a different direction than the wheels are facing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K