Static Friction carnival ride Problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the minimum coefficient of static friction required for patrons to remain adhered to the wall of a cylindrical carnival ride with a radius of 7 meters and a spinning frequency of 20.8 revolutions per minute. The engineers aim to ensure that the normal force does not exceed 1.7 times the weight of each person. The initial attempt to calculate the coefficient of friction resulted in an incorrect value due to a misunderstanding of the normal force's relationship to weight rather than mass. Correcting this misunderstanding is essential for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static friction and its coefficient
  • Knowledge of normal force and its calculation
  • Familiarity with circular motion dynamics
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the concept of normal force in circular motion
  • Study the relationship between weight and mass in physics
  • Learn how to apply the equations of motion for rotating systems
  • Explore examples of static friction calculations in real-world scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, engineering students, and anyone interested in understanding the mechanics of rotational motion and static friction in practical applications.

Jack G

Homework Statement


In a classic carnival ride, patrons stand against the wall in a cylindrically shaped room. Once the room gets spinning fast enough, the floor drops from the bottom of the room! Friction between the walls of the room and the people on the ride make them the “stick” to the wall so they do not slide down. In one ride, the radius of the cylindrical room is R = 7 m and the room spins with a frequency of 20.8 revolutions per minute.

Homework Equations


To be safe, the engineers making the ride want to be sure the normal force does not exceed 1.7 times each persons weight - and therefore adjust the frequency of revolution accordingly. What is the minimum coefficient of friction now needed?

The Attempt at a Solution



Since the normal force(Fn) is a force (F=M*A) and can not exceed 1.7 times the mass of the object I used the inequality Fn<(1.7)(M). The force of static friction should be equal to the force of gravity in this case as it is holding someone steady so it should be Fg=Fs=(9.8)(M). To solve for the static friction coefficient(us) I used the formula Fs=(us)*N. Substituting gives us (9.8)(M)=(us)(1.7)(M). Solving for us gave me (9.8)(M)/(1.7)(M)=(us). The mass cancels itself out leaving me with (us)=9.8/1.7=5.7647 but this is wrong I guess. I am not really sure why though, any help or a push in the right direction would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jack G said:
Since the normal force(Fn) is a force (F=M*A) and can not exceed 1.7 times the mass of the object I used the inequality Fn<(1.7)(M).
Not mass, but weight. (Correct that and you'll be fine.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Sponson
I would start from here: what is the normal force of the problem? What is its direction?
 
A normal force is perpendicular to the surface that exerts it. What is that direction in this case?
 
Bestfrog said:
I would start from here: what is the normal force of the problem? What is its direction?
Jack G does not seem to have a problem with that. Doc Al made the useful response.
kuruman said:
A normal force is perpendicular to the surface that exerts it. What is that direction in this case?
Is that in reply to Bestfrog?
 
haruspex said:
Jack G does not seem to have a problem with that.
I hope not to take him in the wrong way, but he seems to think that the normal force is exerted from the floor.
 
Bestfrog said:
but he seems to think that the normal force is exerted from the floor.
What led you to that conclusion?
 
haruspex said:
Is that in reply to Bestfrog?
Yes, I (carelessly) thought I was replying to OP.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
28K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K