Statics Project Help: Simplifying Distributed Loads & Finding External Forces

  • Thread starter Thread starter ftballguy8282
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Project Statics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on simplifying distributed loads and calculating external forces in a statics project involving a bridge structure. The distributed loads are specified as 2400 lbs at points A and G, 4000 lbs at points B and F, and 3200 lbs at points C, D, and E. The user seeks guidance on how to distribute member weights at nodes and determine external forces, with suggestions to calculate reactions by summing moments at supports. It is noted that member weights can be treated as negligible compared to roof loads, allowing for a focus on the primary loads.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of statics principles, including load distribution
  • Familiarity with truss structures and their geometry
  • Knowledge of calculating moments and reactions in static systems
  • Basic skills in using structural analysis software or manual calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to calculate reactions in truss structures using the method of joints
  • Study the principles of load distribution in structural engineering
  • Explore the use of software tools for structural analysis, such as SAP2000 or ANSYS
  • Investigate the effects of member size and material properties on load-bearing capacity
USEFUL FOR

Engineering students, structural engineers, and anyone involved in the design and analysis of bridge structures will benefit from this discussion.

ftballguy8282
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am working on a statics project and need a little help on what to do next. A link to the project diagram and description is below:

http://i227.photobucket.com/albums/dd178/ftballguy8282/Statics2.jpg

I've simplified the distributed load on top of the bridge to: 2400 lbs above point A, 4000 lbs above point B, 3200 lbs above points C, D, and E, 4000 lbs above point F, and 2400 lbs above point G. The tip says to distribute the weight of the members at the nodes. I'm not sure what exactly that means. Also, I'm unsure of what I should use to start out with for the weight. I know obviously that the stronger the member the greater the weight, but I'm not sure how to start. Should I just use the 1" diameter pipe for each member and use that as a baraomter to go higher or lower? Once I figure out how to use the draw the weight, what would be the easiest way to find the external forces with so many known forces? Maybe moments about point G? Thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry I forgot to add the new one with all the measurements on it. From A to B is 15', B to C, C to D, D to E, and E to F are all 10', and F to G is 15'.
 
ftballguy8282 said:
I am working on a statics project and need a little help on what to do next. A link to the project diagram and description is below:

http://i227.photobucket.com/albums/dd178/ftballguy8282/Statics2.jpg

I've simplified the distributed load on top of the bridge to: 2400 lbs above point A, 4000 lbs above point B, 3200 lbs above points C, D, and E, 4000 lbs above point F, and 2400 lbs above point G. The tip says to distribute the weight of the members at the nodes. I'm not sure what exactly that means. Also, I'm unsure of what I should use to start out with for the weight. I know obviously that the stronger the member the greater the weight, but I'm not sure how to start. Should I just use the 1" diameter pipe for each member and use that as a baraomter to go higher or lower? Once I figure out how to use the draw the weight, what would be the easiest way to find the external forces with so many known forces? Maybe moments about point G? Thanks for any help!
Your distribution of the roof loads is very good. The members weight can be distributed as 2 equal loads, one at the top and one at the bottom of each member, but they are so small compared to the roof load that I wouldn't worry about them initially. You can calculate reactions by summing moments at about anyone support, but since the truss is symmetrical in geometry and load, the vertical reactions at each support are equal, and I don't see any primary horizonal reactions at either support.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K