Statics: pushing a block up a wall w/ friction

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a statics problem involving two blocks (20KG and 10KG) being pushed against a wall with friction. Participants are attempting to determine the smallest force P required to prevent slipping, while navigating through the complexities of forces, normal forces, and torques involved in the system.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • The initial setup involves calculating forces in both x and y directions for the 10KG and 20KG blocks, considering the coefficient of friction.
  • Some participants suggest starting with free body diagrams (FBDs) to visualize the forces acting on the blocks.
  • One participant proposes that the force of tension applied by the rods could be useful in determining the vertical forces acting on the 10KG block.
  • There is a discussion about the influence of the 10KG block on the 20KG block, particularly regarding how friction affects their interactions.
  • Multiple participants recommend creating FBDs for the entire system rather than individual blocks to simplify the analysis of forces and torques.
  • Equations for the sum of forces in both x and y directions, as well as for torques, are derived, leading to relationships between normal forces.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about including certain forces in the torque calculations and whether their logic is correct.
  • A participant calculates a negative value for P, questioning whether a math or logic error occurred, especially in light of a conflicting answer from a textbook.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need for free body diagrams and the importance of considering all forces and torques. However, there is disagreement regarding the correct approach to the problem, particularly in how to account for the interactions between the blocks and the resulting calculations. The discussion remains unresolved as participants explore different methods and calculations.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the assumptions made regarding the forces acting on the blocks, particularly the influence of friction and the geometry of the system. Some participants express uncertainty about the correct application of torque calculations and the relationships between normal forces.

SoylentBlue
Messages
50
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


They ask for the smallest force P to apply if neither block is to slip. Coeff. of friction given as 0.25.
The 20KG block is 196N; the 10KG block is 98.1N
[/B]

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]

If we start at the 10KG block:

Sum of forces x: N + cos26.6P – (cos55.33)(N of 20KG block)

Sum of forces y: -98.1 –sin26.6P + 0.25N + (sin55.3)(N of 20KG block)

So, P pushes the 10KG block away from the wall, and N pushes the block away from the wall; and therefore we need a corresponding force in the x direction to pull it back toward the wall. That force must come from the 20KG block, which is a function of its normal force (multiplied by mu, which we know).
How do we find that?
Well, for the bigger block:
Sum of forces in y: -196.2 + N - (sin55.3)(98.1)-cos16.7P
We have to add in the downward pull of the smaller block (as a function of its geometry) here, right?

Stuck here. Too many variables: Two values of N (one for each block) plus P.

Any help would be appreciated. Thank you :^)
 

Attachments

  • Prob822geom2.jpg
    Prob822geom2.jpg
    3.4 KB · Views: 491
  • Prob822geom.jpg
    Prob822geom.jpg
    3.7 KB · Views: 483
  • Prob822.jpg
    Prob822.jpg
    18 KB · Views: 532
Physics news on Phys.org
You should start by drawing some FBD diagrams.
 
I would find the force of tension applied by the rods. The force in the vertical direction could be found, I believe, by finding the force of gravity and friction on the 10 kg block. Knowing that force should help you with the problem. I solved the problem using that method and it seemed to work out.
 
CWatters said:
You should start by drawing some FBD diagrams.
OK, here's my FBDs.
I wasn't sure how to handle the influence of the 10KG block on the 20KG block. From the point of view of the 20KG block, the 10KG block is pulling it down and to the right. But aren't both these forces also a function of the friction the smaller block feels, since it is dragging against the wall?
 

Attachments

  • Prob822FBD.jpg
    Prob822FBD.jpg
    21.1 KB · Views: 469
I think you will find it easier if you make THREE free body diagrams where the third one is point B.
 
OK, here's my FBD about point B.
From B's point of view, the 10KG is pulling it to the right and down slightly. The downward pull is offset by mu times its N.
From B's point of view, the 20KG block is pulling it up and to the left slightly. The leftward pull is offset by mu times its N.
And we have force P pulling straight down.

Is my logic correct?
prob822FBDaboutB.jpg
 
SoylentBlue said:
OK, here's my FBD about point B.
From B's point of view, the 10KG is pulling it to the right and down slightly. The downward pull is offset by mu times its N.
From B's point of view, the 20KG block is pulling it up and to the left slightly. The leftward pull is offset by mu times its N.
And we have force P pulling straight down.

Is my logic correct?View attachment 206673

I wouldn't approach the problem this way. You should make an FBD of the system as a whole, that way you won't have to deal with the internal forces of each of the 4 rigid bodies.

This FBD would consist of: the P force, the weights of both blocks, the 2 normal forces and the 2 friction forces (mu * Corresponding normal force)
Now all you have to do is: sum of forces in the x and y directions and sum of torques at points A or C.
 
devTr4P said:
I wouldn't approach the problem this way. You should make an FBD of the system as a whole, that way you won't have to deal with the internal forces of each of the 4 rigid bodies.

This FBD would consist of: the P force, the weights of both blocks, the 2 normal forces and the 2 friction forces (mu * Corresponding normal force)
Now all you have to do is: sum of forces in the x and y directions and sum of torques at points A or C.
OK, that makes sense. I am embarrassed to admit I overlooked torques. So here we go:

Sum of forces in Y: -P -196.2 - 98.1 + Ntop + .25Nright = 0
notation: Ntop is normal force of top block
Sum of forces in X: -.25Ntop + Nright =0
Cool! We immediately know a relationship between the 2 normal forces
Sum of torques about A: -.075P - (0.225)(98.1) + (0.225)(.25)(Nright) + (0.325)(Nright)=0

counterclockwise is positive

For torques, P, is counterclockwise, the 10KG wt. is counterclockwise; these are balanced by clockwise friction and Nright

Is my logic correct? I wasn't sure if I should include the Nright in the torque calculation.
Three equations, 3 unknowns; should be solvable, right?
 
SoylentBlue said:
OK, that makes sense. I am embarrassed to admit I overlooked torques. So here we go:

Sum of forces in Y: -P -196.2 - 98.1 + Ntop + .25Nright = 0
notation: Ntop is normal force of top block
Sum of forces in X: -.25Ntop + Nright =0
Cool! We immediately know a relationship between the 2 normal forces
Sum of torques about A: -.075P - (0.225)(98.1) + (0.225)(.25)(Nright) + (0.325)(Nright)=0

counterclockwise is positive

For torques, P, is counterclockwise, the 10KG wt. is counterclockwise; these are balanced by clockwise friction and Nright

Is my logic correct? I wasn't sure if I should include the Nright in the torque calculation.
Three equations, 3 unknowns; should be solvable, right?
Your logic is correct, now just do the math and solve for P.
 
  • #10
devTr4P said:
Your logic is correct, now just do the math and solve for P.
OK, here comes the math.

-P -294.3 + Ntop + 0.25Nright=0
We know that Ntop=4Nright, so we can immediately substitute, giving us:
-P -294.3 + 4.25Nright Let's call this eqn 1

The torque eqn is:
-0.075P-22.07+0.056Nright+.325Nright=0
-0.075P-22.07+0.381Nright=0 Let's call this eqn 2

Let's multiply eqn 2 by (-11.15), giving us:
0.83P + 246 -4.25Nright

We add this to eqn 1; the Nright values cancel, leaving us:
-0.17P -48.3=0
P= -284

Hmmmm...a negative value of P?
The book's answer is 371, although it does not specify direction.
Did I make a math or logic error here somewhere?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
61
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
49
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K