Statistical complications please

  • Thread starter Thread starter Prayerofhope
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statistical
Prayerofhope
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A roadway construction process uses a machine that pours concrete onto the roadway and measures the thinckness of the concrete so the roadway will measure up to the required depth in inches. The concrete thickness needs to be consistent across the road, but the machine isn't perfect and it is costly to operate. Since there's a safety hazard if the roadway is thinner than the minimum 23 inches thickness, the company sets the machine to average 26 inches for the batches of concrete. They believe the thickness level of the machine's concrete output can be decribed by a normal model with standard deviation 1.75 inches. [show work]

a) What percent of the concrete roadway is under the minimum depth ?


b) The company's lawyers insist that no more than 3% of the output be under the limit. Because of the expense of operating the machine, they cannot afford to reset the mean to a higher value. Instead they will try to reduce the standard deviation to achieve the "only 3% under" goal. What SD must they attain?


c) Explain what achieving a smaller standard deviation means in this context.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a) You have a random variable X that is normally distributed with mean 26 and standard deviation 1.75, and you want P(X < 23). If you have a computer program for these use it, otherwise get Z-scores and use the table.

b) Can you find the number from the standard normal distribution that satisfies P(Z \le z) = 0.03? If so then, with
\sigma as the new but unknown standard deviation, solve

<br /> \frac{23-26}{\sigma} = z<br />

for \sigma.

c) What does standard deviation indicate when you deal with measured quantities?
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top