Statistical interpretation (intro to quantum)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics, particularly the concept of expectation values and their relationship to measurable physical quantities. The expectation value, often referred to as the ensemble average, does not necessarily correspond to an actual measurement of a single particle's property. The square of the wave function represents the probability distribution of finding a particle at a specific position, derived from the properties of operators and their eigenfunctions. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the distinction between single measurements and ensemble averages in quantum systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly wave functions and operators.
  • Familiarity with the concept of expectation values and probability distributions in quantum systems.
  • Knowledge of eigenvectors and eigenvalues in the context of quantum operators.
  • Basic grasp of statistical methods as applied to quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics, focusing on operators and their eigenfunctions.
  • Learn about the role of wave functions in quantum mechanics and their interpretation.
  • Explore the concept of ensemble averages in statistical mechanics and their application in quantum systems.
  • Investigate the implications of the Born rule in quantum probability distributions.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics, as well as researchers interested in the statistical foundations of quantum theory.

Colen
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
When we calculate the average of anything: we add up (or integrate) the sum{ [all the things were taking the average of] * [the probability of getting that thing ]}.

The thing about the average I'm that curious about is for example: the average height of 5 people turns out to be say 6 feet. suppose here it turns out that NONE of the people have a height of exactly 6 feet.

So the "average" (expectation value) doesn't correspond to an actual physical value that anyone person has.

So why is it that when we find the expectation value (of say position) on a particle it corresponds to a physical value that we can measure; when this value doesn't (necessarily) correspond to anyone actual value that the particle has?

I think the root of my problem is; how is it that the square of our wave function corresponds to the probability of finding that particle (at a given time and place) ?

Perhaps I'm confusing a single measurement on a particle compared to multiple measurements on a particle in multiple equally prepared states??

Anyways any clarification would be appreciated, Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The term 'expectation value' is an unfortunate one and really should be something more like 'ensemble average'. Imagine you know all of the accessible quantum states of a given system, and there are g of them. And you were to construct an ensemble of g systems one in each of the accessible states. If you were to measure the value of some quantity X for each of the systems and then add up the values and divide by g, this would be the ensemble average or 'expectation value' and there is no reason to expect that the number should be one that is possible to actually measure.

In regards to your question about why the square of a position wave function gives a probability distribution of position, well it is a result of the generalized statistical interpretation. Here is how quantum theory works:

Given an operator, if one can find all of its eigenvectors and eigenvalues, then one can express the state of a system as a linear combination (or integral if the spectrum of eigenvalues is continuous) of the eigenvectors of the operator. If fn is an eigenfunction with eigenvalue n, and the eigenvalue is non degenerate, then the probability to measure the value n is given by the square of the constant on fn in the linear combination. For example, if the operator is the position in one dimension: x, then the eigenfunctions are delta functions, because:

x \delta(x-y) = y \delta(x-y)

and the eigenvalues are any real number y, so that the spectrum is continuous. Now we can write the wave function as an integral over eigenfunctions:

\Psi(x)=\int c(y) \delta(x-y) dy

and as usual the coefficients c(y) can be found by fouriers trick (exploiting the "dirac" orthonormality of the eigenfunctions):

c(y) = \int \Psi(x) \delta(x-y) dx = \Psi(y)

now by the statistical interpretation the probability that we measure a position between y and y+dy is:

P(y+dy) = | c(y) |^2 dy = |\Psi(y)|^2 dy

which is the well known result. Hope that helps
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 309 ·
11
Replies
309
Views
16K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K