Statistical Mechanics: Ideal Gas of Oxygen Atoms in Equilibrium

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the statistical mechanics of an ideal gas of oxygen atoms in equilibrium with absorbed atoms on a planar surface. The system operates at 1 atm and 300K, raising the question of whether classical or quantum statistics should be applied. The equation presented, \(\frac{1}{e^{(\epsilon-\mu)/kT} \pm 1}\), incorporates both Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein statistics, indicating the need to analyze the conditions under which classical statistics apply. Ultimately, it is established that in the classical limit, quantum statistics revert to classical statistical mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical and quantum statistics
  • Familiarity with Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein distributions
  • Knowledge of thermodynamic principles, particularly the Boltzmann distribution
  • Basic concepts of statistical mechanics and equilibrium systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the conditions for applying classical statistics in thermodynamic systems
  • Study the differences between Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein statistics
  • Explore the implications of the Boltzmann limit in statistical mechanics
  • Investigate the behavior of gases under varying temperature and pressure conditions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, and quantum mechanics, will benefit from this discussion.

anon134
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Consider an ideal gas of oxygen atoms in equilibrium with oxygen atoms absorbed on a planar surface. here are N_s sites per unit surface area at which the atoms can be absorbed, and the energy of an absorbed atom is -e compared to one in the free state. The system is under 1 atm and at 300K.

Should the atoms be described by classical statistics or quantum statistics? I need to show this qualitatively and here's what I have:

[tex]\frac{1}{e^{(\epsilon-\mu)/kT} \pm 1}[/tex]
In the classical limit, [itex]\epsilon-\mu>>kT[/tex]<br /> <br /> But we do not know what e is, or mu. Not sure where to go from here, any hints physics forums?[/itex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equation encompasses both Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein statistics because you have a +/- sign in there. Look up both Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein statistics to find out the differences.
 
badphysicist said:
Your equation encompasses both Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein statistics because you have a +/- sign in there. Look up both Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein statistics to find out the differences.

Exactly, since quantum statistics becomes Boltzmann maxwell statistics at the classical limit, so I have the +/- for generality. Thus, regardless of a BE or FD distribution, taking the classical limit will give back classical stat.

Now, the question is, do I use classical statmech or quantum statmech for this problem?
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K