Stereographic projection in de Sitter cosmological model

ahmad2l
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
We know stereographic projection is conformal but it isn't isometic and in general relativity it can not be used because in this theory general transformations must be isometric. But de sitter in his model (1917) used it (stereographic projection) to obtain metric in static coordinates. How can it be explained
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ahmad2l said:
in general relativity it can not be used because in this theory general transformations must be isometric.

Not true. In GR, any change of coordinates is legal as long as it's a diffeomorphism. There is no additional requirement.

In GR, when you do a change of coordinates, you change both the coordinates and the elements of the metric tensor itself. The result is that everything automatically still remains consistent. You're still describing the same spacetime, and it's still a solution to the field equations. All you've done is relabel everything. As a simple exampls, if you take Minkowski space and rescale all the coordinates by a factor of 1/2, and the metric was (+1,-1,-1,-1) in the original coordinates, then the metric in the new coordinates is (+4,-4,-4,-4).

When you talk about things like conformal transformations, you're not talking about a change of coordinates. It's more than a relabeling. For example, you can define a conformal transformation like g\rightarrow \Omega^2 g, while still leaving all the points fixed and describing them with the same coordinates. Or, alternatively, you can define conformal transformations that send points to other points, while leaving the metric the same. (This is how people typically think about conformal transformations in the complex plane.)
 
thank you bcrowell. you saved me
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top