Stern-Gerlach experiment with Gravitons

zen loki
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
It has long been predicted that gravitons will be spin 2. If that is true, then if we have a sufficient magnetic field, what is to stop us from recreating the Stern-Gerlach experiment and using a magnetic field to diffract them?

Now, we have made very strong magnetic fields and to my knowledge, diffracting gravitons have never been detected.

The only reason I can think of, is that the gravitons are virtual, but that should not mean the magnetic field does not effect them, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The B-field does not couple to the spin but to the magnetic moment μ which is proportional to the spin S

μ = g q/2m S

where the dimensionless quantity g is called the g-factor.

For a elementary, massless, uncharged particle it is natural to assume g=0 (there may be quantum effects changing this relation).

Before asking this question regarding gravitons one should try to answer this question for photons.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top