Why did Stern and Gerlach use a non-uniform magnetic field in their experiment?

touqra
Messages
284
Reaction score
0
Why does the Stern-Gerlach experiment used non-uniform magnetic field? Why not a uniform magnetic field?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the field were uniform there would be no net force on the atoms and thus no separation of the quantized spin orientations. (Think of the atom as being a magnetic dipole. A non-uniform field exerts a different force on each "pole", thus giving the atom a net force depending upon the orientation of the dipole.)
 
Stern and Gerlach used neutral particles: hot silver atoms from an oven. Lorentz force (experienced by atoms) due to an eventually uniform field should be globally zero. So the net force acting on atoms must be another: atom is a coil-like system and what they did is to dealing with it as with the induction coil you find in an analogical multimeter.
You obtain a force just for a non-null derivative of magnetic induction, that is F=gbB where:
g is the coupling constant between angular momentum and magnetic dipole momentum
B is your field
b is there because I supposed B=a+bz along the non-uniform axis.
Stern and Gerlach knew the presence of an magnetic momentum for atoms also before the experiment, but they obtained its quantization by showing it with astonishing facts!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am looking at the Laughlin wave function and it contains the term $$\prod_{j<k}^{N}\left(z_j-z_k\right)^q$$ In Wikipedia the lower index on ##\Pi## is ##1\le i<j\le N## and there is no upper index. I'm not sure what either mean. For example would $$\prod_{j<k}^{N}\left(z_j-z_k\right)^q=\prod_{k=2}^{N}\left[\prod_{j=1}^{k-1}\left(z_j-z_k\right)^q\right]?$$ (It seems that ##k## cannot be 1 because there would be nothing to multiply in the second product). I'm not sure what else the...
Back
Top