Stiffness vs. electric potential

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between stiffness and electric potential, questioning the validity of the inquiry. It emphasizes that electric potential does not influence mechanical stiffness, drawing an analogy to unrelated factors like strawberry jam. The conversation also touches on the need for clarity regarding the type of stiffness and materials involved. While humorous anecdotes about children's experiments with jam add levity, they do not contribute to the scientific inquiry. Overall, the consensus is that electric potential does not affect stiffness.
jaejoon89
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
How is stiffness affected by potential?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your question seems about as valid as the question "How is stiffness affected by strawberry jam?" Are you talking about mechanical stiffness? This is still ill defined... in what mechanical modules are you interested? If you are, what kind of material are you talking about? So your potential is supposed to be an electrical potential. Did you have a set up for some kind of voltage in mind?

The answer is probably: "Electric potential doesn't affect stiffness." Just like strawberry jam normally doesn't affect stiffness.
 
0xDEADBEEF said:
strawberry jam normally doesn't affect stiffness.
Hmm, I know by repeated experiments performed by my children that strawberry jam applied liberally and allowed to dry does indeed affect the stiffness of shirts, pants, carpet, and hair (both human and feline). Admittedly, said experiments were performed without the benefit of a proper control group, and the statistical error analysis has been notably missing, but the randomization of the experimental design was superb. :smile: My children, being incorrigible empiricists, have also been running similar studies on raspberry jam, honey, and syrup; I found their most recent experiment with syrup just last night.

That said, I fully agree with your general point.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top