Stokes theorem, parametrizing composite curves

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion centers around calculating a line integral using Stokes' theorem, specifically for a vector field defined as F = along a composite curve formed by three segments. The problem involves understanding the parametrization of the curve and the application of Stokes' theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to divide the line integral into three parts and considers the application of Stokes' theorem, questioning the parametrization of the curve. Some participants suggest examining the curl of the vector field and question whether using Stokes' theorem is appropriate in this context.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different approaches to the problem. There is a focus on understanding the implications of the curl and whether it simplifies the integration process. No consensus has been reached regarding the best method to proceed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of the curl being zero and the complexity of integrating over the curved surface versus the original line integral. There is an emphasis on ensuring thoroughness in the approach to the problem.

Gauss M.D.
Messages
151
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Calculate the line integral:

F = <xz, (xy2 + 2z), (xy + z)>

along the curve given by:

1) x = 0, y2 + z2 = 1, z > 0, y: -1 → 1
2) z = 0, x + y = 1, y: 1→0
3) z = 0, x-y = 1, y: 0 → -1

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I don't think the problem is very difficult when just dividing the line integral into three parts, calculating each separately. But I want to be thorough to see if I got all the concepts.

I tried to draw the curve (see attachment) which made me realize a cone cut in half would be a capping surface, so we should be able to apply Stokes theorem. But I'm having trouble parametrizing it since we've basically dealt exclusively with very standard parametrizations.

I think that one parameter should be the height of the cone, h = [itex]\sqrt{y^{2}+z^{2}[/itex] running from 0 to 1 and the other should be the angle in the xz-plane running from 0 to [itex]\pi[/itex]. I'm just having trouble setting up the variable substitution. Can anyone give me a push?
 

Attachments

  • semicone.jpg
    semicone.jpg
    2.3 KB · Views: 402
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Gauss M.D.! :smile:

Before you spend time trying to apply stokes …

what is the curl? :wink:
 
<x-2,x-y,y^2>... you're saying Stokes theorem is a bad idea here?
 
stokes is useful if the curl is 0, or something simple

which do you think is easier, integrating that curl over that curved surface, or integrating the original line integral directly? :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K