Schools Straight to University or Transfer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rakbarut
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    University
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the dilemma of pursuing a physics career as a high school senior with a solid academic record (3.7 GPA, 2040 SAT, 32 ACT). The individual is considering whether to attend UCSB, which has a strong physics program and offers lab and internship opportunities, or to start at a community college (CC) and transfer to a more prestigious university like UC Berkeley or Caltech after one or two years. The consensus suggests that while attending a top university can enhance networking and research opportunities, the choice may ultimately depend on financial considerations. It is also noted that applying to multiple universities, including UCSD and others, is advisable to explore all options for admission and financial aid. The individual expresses a preference for UCSB due to its research opportunities but seeks to compare it with UCSD's physics program.
rakbarut
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Over the past summer, I have really fallen in love with Physics. It is the most beautiful of subjects and I am pretty sure I want to pursue it as a career. Here is the problem i am facing right now...I am currently a senior in high school and although my grades and sats/acts are alright (3.7 Unweighted, 2040 SAT, and 32 ACT) they are not good enough to get into a top-notch university like Stanford or Berkeley, yet I am almost positive I can get into UCSB, which has a really good physics program. The question I ask is should I go to UCSB straight out of high school, where i have opportunities to work in labs and intern, or should i go to a CC and transfer after two years(maybe one because i have already taken 5 college courses as well as multiple A.Ps) to a better university like UcB or Caltech (since i live in Pasadena, and they have an agreement with Pasadena Community College)??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you really want to work in the field of physics, you will probably find yourself going to graduate school, in which case your choice of undergraduate institution is somewhat less important. In that case, I would say that your decision is mainly a matter of economics... CC and then a university would be cheaper, but if you can afford it, it is probably better to go directly to a university so you can get to know the profs and students in the department.
 
rakbarut said:
Over the past summer, I have really fallen in love with Physics. It is the most beautiful of subjects and I am pretty sure I want to pursue it as a career. Here is the problem i am facing right now...I am currently a senior in high school and although my grades and sats/acts are alright (3.7 Unweighted, 2040 SAT, and 32 ACT) they are not good enough to get into a top-notch university like Stanford or Berkeley, yet I am almost positive I can get into UCSB, which has a really good physics program. The question I ask is should I go to UCSB straight out of high school, where i have opportunities to work in labs and intern, or should i go to a CC and transfer after two years(maybe one because i have already taken 5 college courses as well as multiple A.Ps) to a better university like UcB or Caltech (since i live in Pasadena, and they have an agreement with Pasadena Community College)??
I'm sure you can get into Berkeley with that GPA and SAT score. There's also UCSD and others. Caltech should also be possible.

Just apply to all of those schools and see what happens. Scholarships and perhaps student work/employment should be available. Explore ALL your options for financial assistance and work.
 
Thanks for the advice, ill defiantly take what both you guys said into consideration...also, does UCSD or UCSB have a better physics program? I kind of like UCSB better because there seems to be a lot of opportunities to do lab research which I know is crucial to getting into a good graduate program, but will I get the same opportunities or more at UCSD?
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top