Strange behavior of the density of the water around the freezing point

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the unusual behavior of water density near its freezing point, particularly the expansion of water as it cools from 4°C to 0°C. This phenomenon is attributed to the polar nature of water molecules, which form a crystalline structure when freezing, causing a decrease in density. Participants express interest in understanding the molecular shape's impact on this behavior and seek diagrammatic illustrations for clarity. The conversation also touches on the maximum density of water occurring at approximately 4°C and how this behavior differs in seawater due to dissolved materials. Overall, the thread emphasizes the complexities of water's density changes and the need for further visual explanations.
bolbol2054
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
please is there a topic that discuss with illustration factor that causes Strange behavior of the density of the water around the freezing point
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you be more specific?
Do you mean why it begins to expand?

That's fairly simple; water begins to expand because its poles are trying to line up so it can form a crystaline matrix.

Get ten people to crowd together in the centre of a room with their arms outstretched. They could probably crowd together pretty closely - outstretched arms overlapping and intertwined - if you herded them together.

Now, with their arms still outstretched, tell them to move around so they can hold hands with each other. They won't be able to grab each others' hands until they step back a pace or two. They'll take up more of the room.
 
I presume you mean the fact that the maximum density is around +4 degrees centigrade?

This is due to the highly polar nature of the water molecule because of its shape.

Please note this is only applies to fresh water ie pure water. Water with dissolved material eg seawater does not exhibit this phenomenon.
 
i meant with strange behavior that water contradicts the role of decreasing density due to increasing temperatur at a range from 0 c degree to 4 c degree
 
Studiot said:
I presume you mean the fact that the maximum density is around +4 degrees centigrade?

This is due to the highly polar nature of the water molecule because of its shape.

yes sir that's exactly what i meant but i want to know with more diagramatic illustration the effect of molecule's shape on this behaviour i thought that such basic phenomena had a lot of discussion in previous threads
 
Is your question, why is water less dense at 2C than at 4C even though it isn't ice?

Heck if I know. I'm not a chemist. But as an aspiring odds-maker, my money says that an increase in the time that hydrogen in one molecule temporarily bonds to oxygen in another dominates over the thermal agitation that would separate them.

Was that the question? If so, I wonder what the density curve of supercooled water looks like.
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top