Strange case: Bottle of water freezing

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the phenomenon of supercooling, which allows water to remain in a liquid state below its normal freezing point of 0 °C. This occurs due to the absence of nucleation centers, such as impurities or gas bubbles, in pure water. Shaking the supercooled water can trigger rapid freezing, demonstrating the process effectively. Additionally, the conversation touches on the surprising quality of bottled water, which often lacks the necessary impurities for freezing. Overall, the thread highlights the intriguing properties of supercooled water and the conditions that enable this phenomenon.
Physics news on Phys.org
Cool demonstration but not a mystery much: I think it is just supercooling. The lack of imperfections etc. provides a lack of nucleation centres.

Shaking does the rest.
 
I think you are right...I no idea water could be supercooled to such a LOW temperature:
Water normally freezes at 273.15 K (0 °C or 32 °F) however it can also be "supercooled" at standard pressure down to its crystal homogeneous nucleation at almost 224.8 K (−48.3 °C/−55 °F). [2][3] The process of supercooling requires that water be pure and free of nuclei such as having undergone reverse osmosis, however the cooling itself does not require any specialised technique.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SupercoolingI'm also surprised because reviews of bottled water show it often of a no so good quality...Consumer Reports, I think.
 
Exactly, it is due to the lack of suspended solids and gas bibbles to act as nucleation centres. Overheating is also easily observed if you heat water twice in a microwave oven. The second time due to the lack of gas bubles to act as seeds for condensation you can reach a temperature much above water's boling point without boiling, however, any disturbance causes an explosive generation of vapour (if you decide to try it, be very careful!).
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top