Strange electric-optical unit (a.u.)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Micko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Strange Unit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the use of arbitrary units (a.u.) in the context of low temperature GaAs MSM photo switches for ultrafast sampling. The original poster is confused about the meaning of a.u. on the y-axis of a signal plot, suspecting it refers to atomic units, which is deemed incorrect. It is clarified that a.u. likely stands for arbitrary units, indicating that the signal is measured in a way where absolute calibration is not necessary, focusing instead on relative changes over time. This approach is common in experimental physics, where precise calibration may not be feasible but relative measurements are still valuable. The conversation highlights the practical considerations in interpreting experimental data.
Micko
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Hello to all,
I'm reading one article about LT (low temperature) GaAs MSM (metal-semiconductor-metal) photo switches that has application in ultrafast sampling.
Basically, there is one photoswitch in series with hold capacitor. Special test is performed which gives electro-optical signal depending on time. Problem is in the way how plot is given in the terms of units. On x-axis is time in ps, but on y-axis in signal given in a.u. I know that a.u.means atomic unit, but this is not it, it can't be. I cannot find any other meaning of a.u.
Do you know what this could mean?
Thanks
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    13.2 KB · Views: 423
Physics news on Phys.org
a.u. can also mean arbitrary units.
I suspect they are measuring the signal using an instrument where they can't easily relate the absolute value of the signal to the reading; i.e. only the relative value of the signal is important.

This is quite common in experimental physics; in many experiments it is almost impossible to "calibrate" the instruments which is fine as long as one is only interested in how a signal changes over time.
 
f95toli said:
This is quite common in experimental physics; in many experiments it is almost impossible to "calibrate" the instruments which is fine as long as one is only interested in how a signal changes over time.
I wouldn't say so much as impossible as irrelevant in a linear system since the absolute readings scale with the power of your source anyway.

Claude.
 
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top