FFT and Resistor Noise Newbie Questions - PLEASE HELP

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around measuring thermal noise produced by resistors in a precision resistive divider setup. Participants explore the implications of FFT analysis, noise floor requirements, and measurement techniques relevant to capturing low noise figures and drift rates. The conversation includes technical details about sampling rates, measurement devices, and the characteristics of noise in resistors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their setup for measuring thermal noise from resistors and expresses uncertainty about interpreting FFT results and noise floor requirements.
  • Another participant requests clarification on the data measurement and sampling methods, specifically the sample rate and bandwidth of the measurement device.
  • A later reply provides details about the measurement process, including the sampling interval of 0.08 seconds and the bandwidth of the multimeter being approximately 6.1 Hz.
  • One participant suggests that measuring noise at 100 or 120 Hz is necessary, arguing that 6.1 Hz is insufficient for accurate noise measurement.
  • Another participant notes that metal layer resistors produce low thermal noise, providing an example of expected noise levels for a specific resistor value.
  • There is a suggestion that the measurement device (voltmeter) may be introducing noise, and a recommendation to use an oscilloscope or spectrum analyzer for better results.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the adequacy of the measurement setup, particularly regarding the sampling rate and the effectiveness of the multimeter for capturing low noise levels. There is no consensus on the best approach for measuring the noise or the interpretation of the FFT results.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the specific characteristics of the measurement device, the potential influence of the voltmeter on the noise readings, and the unresolved nature of the optimal sampling frequency for accurate noise measurement.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in precision measurement techniques, noise analysis in electronic circuits, and the application of FFT in experimental physics may find this discussion relevant.

jonlg_uk
Messages
141
Reaction score
0
Hi all. I have been recording the thermal noise produced by a number of resistors. I have created a excel sheet that takes the readings from the 8 1/2 DVM and performs a FFT on them, in order to give me the frequency domain plot. However I am not 100% certain of what I am seeing because of my limited understanding on this topic.


fft.jpg


Basically I am building a precision resistive divider that divides the high voltage produced by the power supply down to a measurable low voltage reading for the 8 1/2 DVM. My customer is requesting that the divider must perform suitably in order to allow the measurement of noise figures of less than 0.2ppm and drift of less than 1ppm/hour. THE "noise" I refer to is produced by the HV power supply. They basically want to measure the noise produced by this power supply.

Here is what I don't understand:

Say my high voltage power supply produced 10KV and my divider was had a ratio of 1:1000 then the output voltage of the divider would be 10V and 0.2ppm of 10V=2uV. So basically the divider needs to have a noise floor of less than 2uV. From the first plot the noise floor would correspond to the "thickness of the line" right? and the drift/hour would be the max-min of the voltage over a hour period, correct?

The other thing I don't understand is to do with the FFT plot. So the Y axis is measured in V/Root(Hz), say at 3Hz point on the FFT plot I see a noise value of ~0.2uV/Root Hz. Then does that mean that on the first plot (the time domain plot) if I was to zoom in of down to a resolution of BELOW 0.333seconds (1/3Hz) and measure all the points at say 6Hz (The Nyquist rate i.e. the minimum sampling rate required to avoid aliasing, equal to twice the highest frequency contained within the signal.) would I see average voltage amplitude of 0.2uV at 0.16666sec time intervals (1/6Hz) ? Would this mean that the divider is capable of being able to perform suitably in order to allow the measurement of noise figures of less than 0.2ppm, as the customer is asking for?

I basically want to know if the V/root(hz) seen on the frequency domain plot matches the raw voltage measurement seen on the time domain plot. What is the difference? and does the fact that I am reading ~0.2 uV/root(hz) on the frequency plot mean that the system is good for enabling noise measurement of less than 0.2ppm from the high voltage power supply?

I thank you all in advance


J
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
bumpity bump - please help
 
Hi jonlg. Can you tell us a bit more about how the data was measured and sampled. What was the sample rate (was it uniform) and do you know the bandwidth of the measurement device.
 
uart said:
Hi jonlg. Can you tell us a bit more about how the data was measured and sampled. What was the sample rate (was it uniform) and do you know the bandwidth of the measurement device.

Hi thanks for the reply. The data was measured using a 8 1/2 Digital Multi Meter, that sampled the output voltage of the resistive divider every 0.08 seconds, uniform over the duration of the measurement. This data is stored in the multi meters internal memory and sent to a PC at the end of the measurement. The bandwidth of the multi meter was ~6.1 Hz.


N.B The multi meter has a "Number of power cycle" (NPLC) function, that basically integrates the voltage signal to eliminate power line noise. In this instance the NPLC was set to 4, which dictates the cut off frequency of the multi meter as aresult the cut off frequency was 6.1Hz
 
- You MUST measure the noise at 100 or 120 Hz (depending on your mains frequency). 6.1 Hz does not suffice.

- If your resistors are made of metal layer (not carbon!) their noise is essentially thermal, that is, very low. Even if the smaller resistor has 100 kohm its noise over 200 Hz will be 0.6 µV RMS.

- 8 1/2 digits make strictly no sense whatsoever. Use an oscilloscope in AC mode, possibly with a pre-amplifier, or use a spectrum analyzer (but check its low-frequency cutoff).

- The noise you're seeing presently comes very probably from the voltmeter. Try without the power supply.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
4K