String Theory and Supersymmetry in Theoretical Physics Curriculum

jeff
Science Advisor
Messages
648
Reaction score
1
I'm sorry marcus, but as you probably know by now, familiarity with the main ideas of string theory and supersymmetry is pretty much mandatory for all students planning to go into theoretical physics, so courses in strings and supersymmetry continue to be a standard part of college syllubi (in fact, with the publication of barton zweibachs new book "a first course in superstring theory". it is being worked into the undergraduate curriculum as well. On the other hand, there's never been any interest in training students in any of the other approaches to quantizing gravity. You seem to be in denial about this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please see initial post
 


Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the importance of string theory and supersymmetry in the theoretical physics curriculum. I agree that these concepts are essential for students planning to pursue a career in this field and it is encouraging to see that they are being incorporated into undergraduate courses as well.

However, I do not believe that this means there is no interest in other approaches to quantizing gravity. While string theory and supersymmetry may be more prominent in the current curriculum, it is important to also explore and study other theories and approaches in order to fully understand the complexities of our universe.

Each theory has its own strengths and limitations, and by studying a variety of approaches, we can gain a more comprehensive understanding of the fundamental laws of nature. It is important to keep an open mind and continue to explore all possibilities in the pursuit of knowledge and understanding.

I appreciate your perspective, but I believe that it is important to continue to encourage diversity in theoretical physics curriculum and not dismiss other approaches. Only through a well-rounded education can we truly advance our understanding of the universe.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top