String Theory: Energy as Property of Strings?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Curious6
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Strings
Curious6
Messages
183
Reaction score
0
I just read the old thread on "What are strings made of?" https://www.physicsforums.com/archive/t-8995 and one member states that energy is just a property of the fundamental building block (string) just like momentum is a property of it. I wondered if that is the consensus, because I have always found it difficult to imagine energy as something physical and it makes more sense to me if it is truly a property of the string rather than actually a string being made of energy. Any comments on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
energy could be a 1d effect of a string not vibrating in all of our 3d perceived universe
 


The idea that energy is a property of strings in string theory is a common interpretation, but it is not the only one. Some physicists view strings as being made of energy, while others see energy as a property of the strings themselves. Ultimately, it is a matter of perspective and interpretation.

One way to think about it is that energy is a fundamental quantity that describes the state of a system. In string theory, strings are the fundamental building blocks of the universe, and their behavior and properties are described by energy. So in a sense, energy is a property of strings because it is necessary to understand their behavior.

On the other hand, some physicists argue that energy is not a property of strings, but rather a property of the space-time fabric in which the strings exist. This view suggests that strings are not made of energy, but rather they interact with energy in space-time.

Overall, the concept of energy in string theory is still a topic of debate and further research is needed to fully understand its role in this theory. It is important to keep an open mind and consider different perspectives when trying to understand complex and abstract concepts like energy in string theory.
 
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
Many of us have heard of "twistors", arguably Roger Penrose's biggest contribution to theoretical physics. Twistor space is a space which maps nonlocally onto physical space-time; in particular, lightlike structures in space-time, like null lines and light cones, become much more "local" in twistor space. For various reasons, Penrose thought that twistor space was possibly a more fundamental arena for theoretical physics than space-time, and for many years he and a hardy band of mostly...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top