String theory & Quantum Mechanics

AI Thread Summary
String theory did not arise as a solution to a paradox in quantum mechanics regarding objects being in multiple places simultaneously. The notion of such a paradox is largely a misunderstanding or oversimplification of quantum mechanics. While quantum mechanics does present many counterintuitive concepts, the specific idea of multiple locations is not a recognized paradox within the field. Further exploration in quantum mechanics subforums is encouraged for a deeper understanding. The discussion highlights the importance of distinguishing between popular interpretations and the actual principles of quantum mechanics.
Grajek
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Did string theory come about as a possible solution to quantum mechanic's "something being in several places at the same time" paradox so to speak? I am not a math-guy or pretend to know anything about physics. I m just curious. I was thinking that what appears as something being in multiple places at the same time is a vibration. Just like a guitar string when "plucked." It appears to be in several places at the same time but in fact it is not.

Thanks in advanced for anything that may satisfy my curiosity
-Grajek
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Grajek said:
Did string theory come about as a possible solution to quantum mechanic's "something being in several places at the same time" paradox so to speak?
No. Quantum mechanics doesn't really have such a paradox - you'll see it in popularizations but it's somewhere between an oversimplification and an outright misconception. There are many threads on this topic over in the QM subforum here.

(QM does have plenty of other weirdnesses and counterintuitive concepts though)
 
  • Like
Likes davidbenari
Thanks for the reply. I will out QM subforums
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
33
Views
7K
Replies
58
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top