Struggling to show that this series converges.

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Set Abominae
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the convergence of the series \(\sum \frac{\log(r)}{r^{a}}\) as \(r\) approaches infinity, using the ratio test and integral criteria. It is established that for \(a < 0\), the series diverges. For \(0 \leq a \leq 1\), the series also diverges due to the comparison with \(\sum \frac{1}{r^{a}}\), which is known to diverge. The behavior of the series for \(a > 1\) remains to be analyzed further.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of series convergence tests, particularly the ratio test.
  • Familiarity with logarithmic functions and their properties.
  • Knowledge of integral convergence criteria.
  • Basic concepts of asymptotic analysis and series expansion.
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate the convergence of series using the ratio test in more depth.
  • Learn about integral convergence criteria and their applications in series analysis.
  • Explore the expansion of logarithmic functions for large values of \(r\).
  • Examine the behavior of series for different ranges of \(a\), particularly \(a > 1\).
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying calculus or real analysis, and anyone interested in series convergence and logarithmic functions.

Set Abominae
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi there,
I'm trying to show that [tex]\sum\frac{log(r)}{r^{a}}[/tex] (r going from 1 to infinity) converges using the ratio test, but I can't seem to deal with the log(r+1)/log(r) term.
Any help would be much appreciated.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it not sufficient to note that r^a/(r+1)^a is a null sequence, so anything it is multiplied by will also be a null sequence? (null x bounded = null...etc).
 
i would use this (it is supposed that your series goes from n=1 to infinite

integral criteria , if the integral [tex]\int _{1}^{\infty} dx log(x)x^{-a}[/tex] converges so does your series

on the other hand an useful trick is to use the expansion of log (r+1) for big r

log(r+1)=log(r)+log(1+1/r) and since 1/r is small you can expand it into a/r+b/r*r and so on
 
It depends on your value of a. If a is negative, the series diverges. If 0<= a <= 1 then for r >=3 we have [tex]\frac{1}{r^a} < \frac{ln(r)}{r^a}[/tex] and so [tex]\sum\frac{1}{r^{a}} < \sum\frac{ln(r)}{r^{a}}[/tex]. The left side of the inequality diverges (because 0<= a <= 1) and so the series on the right side diverges.

I haven't thought about a > 1 yet. I'll get back to that when I get back home.
 
JG89 said:
It depends on your value of a. If a is negative, the series diverges. If 0<= a <= 1 then for r >=3 we have [tex]\frac{1}{r^a} < \frac{ln(r)}{r^a}[/tex] and so [tex]\sum\frac{1}{r^{a}} < \sum\frac{ln(r)}{r^{a}}[/tex]. The left side of the inequality diverges (because 0<= a <= 1) and so the series on the right side diverges.

I haven't thought about a > 1 yet. I'll get back to that when I get back home.

I should have mentioned, I was considering a>1. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K