Study the autocorrelation function

  • Thread starter T.Engineer
  • Start date
  • #1
87
0
I would like to know how to find the autocorrelation function.
If there are any links for free e-books that can I downloaded to study the autocorrelation function and its properties in details.
Thanks!
 

Answers and Replies

  • #5
87
0
I am going to find the autocorrelation function for the following equation
Hn(t)= (-1)^n * e^(t^2)* d^n/dt^n * e^(-t^2)

So, I didnt find the previous links can help me to solve this problem.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
EnumaElish
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2,304
124
You need to solve

Lims-->0-ss Hn(t)Hn(t+s)ds / (2s).

Note,
-ss Hn(t)Hn(t+s)ds = ∫t-zz-t Hn(t)Hn(z)dz
 
Last edited:
  • #7
87
0
You need to solve

Lims-->0∫-ss Hn(t)Hn(t+s)ds / (2s).

Note,
∫-ss Hn(t)Hn(t+s)ds = ∫t-zz-t Hn(t)Hn(z)dz


but I want to understand why you suggest this. I want to understad exactly by steps how can I find a solution.
Thanks alot.
 
  • #9
87
0
Thanks alot EnumaElish!
I will try to read these and I will reply you.
Thanks alot.
 
  • #10
87
0
You need to solve

Lims-->0-ss Hn(t)Hn(t+s)ds / (2s).

Note,
-ss Hn(t)Hn(t+s)ds = ∫t-zz-t Hn(t)Hn(z)dz
I couldnt solve the equation
t-zz-t Hn(t)Hn(z)dz

may be I should to follow such courses that explain Autocorrelation function or may be I must make reveiw for the integrals.
I want to advise me, please.
 
  • #11
EnumaElish
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2,304
124
For starters,

∫Hn(t)Hn(z)dz = Hn(t)∫Hn(z)dz.

Then, insert Hn(z) = (-1)^n * e^(z^2)* d^n/dz^n * e^(-z^2). Now you have:

Hn(t)∫(-1)^n * e^(z^2)* d^n/dz^n * e^(-z^2)dz = Hn(t)(-1)^n ∫e^(z^2)* fn(z) dz

where fn(z) = d^n/dz^n * e^(-z^2).

You need to work on solving ∫e^(z^2)* fn(z) dz.
___________________
CORRECTION: Lims-->0-ss Hn(t)Hn(t+s)ds should have been LimT-->0-TT Hn(t)Hn(t+s)ds.

Then, defining z = t+s, we have-TT Hn(t)Hn(t+s)ds = ∫-TT Hn(t)Hn(z)dz.

This does not change the substance of the advice I have given until now.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
87
0
For starters,

∫Hn(t)Hn(z)dz = Hn(t)∫Hn(z)dz.

Then, insert Hn(z) = (-1)^n * e^(z^2)* d^n/dz^n * e^(-z^2). Now you have:

Hn(t)∫(-1)^n * e^(z^2)* d^n/dz^n * e^(-z^2)dz = Hn(t)(-1)^n ∫e^(z^2)* fn(z) dz

where fn(z) = d^n/dz^n * e^(-z^2).

You need to work on solving ∫e^(z^2)* fn(z) dz.
___________________
CORRECTION: Lims-->0-ss Hn(t)Hn(t+s)ds should have been LimT-->0-TT Hn(t)Hn(t+s)ds.

Then, defining z = t+s, we have-TT Hn(t)Hn(t+s)ds = ∫-TT Hn(t)Hn(z)dz.

This does not change the substance of the advice I have given until now.


let g(z)=∫e^(z^2)* fn(z) dz
for n = 1

fn(z)= d/dz e^-(z^2)= -2 z e-(z^2)
So, g(z) = ∫-2 z * e^(z^2)* e-(z^2) dz
= ∫-2 z *e^[(z^2)-(z^2)] dz
= ∫-2 z dz
=-z^2

is not that true?
 
  • #13
EnumaElish
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2,304
124
Your calculation looks right.

Now you need to put in the integration limits (-T, T), multiply with Hn(t)(-1)^n, then take the limit T --> 0.
 
  • #14
87
0
Now you need to put in the integration limits (-T, T), multiply with Hn(t)(-1)^n, then take the limit T --> 0.[/QUOTE]

we have fn(z) = -Z^2 for n =1
by multiplying it by (-1)^n
we will have Z^2
by multiplying it by Hn(t),
where Hn(t)= (-1)^n * e^(t^2)* d^n/dt^n [e^-(t^2)]
Then, we will have:
Z^2 * (-1)^n * e^(t^2)* d^n/dt^n [e^-(t^2)], where z = t+s
So, how I will find the integral and I have two variables (t and Z)??
Can you help me, Please.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
EnumaElish
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2,304
124
Remember, the integral is a definite integral. It has limits "from -T to T." You need to evaluate the integral according to the limits.

Before you multiply the integral with Hn(t), you need to apply the integ. limits to -z^2. This will make z "disappear." The z^2 will be replaced with a quadratic function of T, say q(T).

Do you understand what q(T) is? Can you derive it explicitly?
 
  • #16
87
0
Remember, the integral is a definite integral. It has limits "from -T to T." You need to evaluate the integral according to the limits.

Before you multiply the integral with Hn(t), you need to apply the integ. limits to -z^2. This will make z "disappear." The z^2 will be replaced with a quadratic function of T, say q(T).

Do you understand what q(T) is? Can you derive it explicitly?
OK, I will have:
-z^2[tex]\left|^{T}_{-T}[/tex]
then I will get
-(T)^2 - [- (-T)^2]= 0
So, the autocorelation for
Hn(t)Hn(t+s)ds = 0

is that true!!!
 
Last edited:
  • #17
EnumaElish
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2,304
124
It seems to be true for n=1.

Can you solve the general case for arbitrary n?
 
  • #18
87
0
It seems to be true for n=1.

Can you solve the general case for arbitrary n?
Actually, this is exactly what I am going to ask you about.
So, can you just help me a little bit?
And I have another question:
What about the autocorrelation of
Hn(t)Hm(t)dt , where m not equal to n
 
  • #19
EnumaElish
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2,304
124
I cannot see the LaTex equation for m. There seems to be a typesetting error.

EDIT: I can see it now.

For the Hn(t)Hn(t+s) case, you need to work on solving ∫e^(z^2)* fn(z) dz for arbitrary n.

The Hn(t)Hm(t)dt case is not a regular AC function. Go back to the MathWorld link (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Autocorrelation.html) and review the definition. The AC function has a single argument (a single function), for example, ac(t) = AC(Hn(t)) or equivalently ac = AC(Hn). What you are proposing has two arguments, Hn and Hm. So it doesn't fit the definition of AC.
 
Last edited:
  • #20
87
0
when I written:the autocorrelation of Hn(t)Hm(t)dt
I meant that what about the autocorrelation function between the first derivative of H(t) and the second derivative of H(t)
Such as :
the autocorrelation function of H1(t)H2(t).
Thanks alot!
 
  • #21
87
0
I cannot see the LaTex equation for m. There seems to be a typesetting error.

EDIT: I can see it now.

For the Hn(t)Hn(t+s) case, you need to work on solving ∫e^(z^2)* fn(z) dz for arbitrary n.

The Hn(t)Hm(t)dt case is not a regular AC function. Go back to the MathWorld link (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Autocorrelation.html) and review the definition. The AC function has a single argument (a single function), for example, ac(t) = AC(Hn(t)) or equivalently ac = AC(Hn). What you are proposing has two arguments, Hn and Hm. So it doesn't fit the definition of AC.

for n=1
∫e^(z^2)* fn(z) dz = -z^2
for n=2
∫e^(z^2)* fn(z) dz = [tex]\frac{3}{4}[/tex] z^3

So, should I continue for n=3,4,5,...
 
  • #22
EnumaElish
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2,304
124
when I written:the autocorrelation of Hn(t)Hm(t)dt
I meant that what about the autocorrelation function between the first derivative of H(t) and the second derivative of H(t)
Such as :
the autocorrelation function of H1(t)H2(t).
Thanks alot!
The AC function has a very specific definition; and it is defined for a single parent function.

I am going to look at your question that way. You can write the AC function of H1*H2 by following the general definition of AC for function F:

ACF(t) = LimT--->0 -TT F(t) F(t+s) ds / (2T)

and making the substitution F = H1*H2.
 
Last edited:
  • #23
EnumaElish
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2,304
124
for n=1
∫e^(z^2)* fn(z) dz = -z^2
for n=2
∫e^(z^2)* fn(z) dz = [tex]\frac{3}{4}[/tex] z^3

So, should I continue for n=3,4,5,...
You can continue and hope that you will "see" the general solution eventually by induction and guesswork. But the more direct approach is to try to solve the general case algebraically.
 
  • #24
87
0
The correlation is equal to the average of the product of two random variables and is defined as
cor(X,Y) = E[XY]
= ∫∞ −∞∫∞ −∞ xyf(x,y)dxdy

So, if the above equation seems to be correct, then I can define H1(t) as X and H2(t) as Y.
Can I work like this depending on the above?


And for a given set of variables, we use the correlation coefficient to give us the linear relationship between our variables. The correlation coefficient of two variables is defined in terms of their covariance and standard deviations, as seen below
ρ= cor(X,Y)/σχ σΥ

If there is no relationship between the variables then the correlation coefficient will be zero and if there is a perfect positive match it will be one.
If there is a perfect inverse relationship, where one set of variables increases while the other decreases, then the correlation coefficient will be negative one.

So, my second equastion is how to find the mean and variance for H1(t) and H2(t)
Hint: if Hn(t)= (-1)^n cos(2π fc t)* e^[(t^2)/4] *d^n/dt^n *e^[(t^2)/4]

Thanks alot!!
 
Last edited:
  • #25
EnumaElish
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2,304
124
The correlation is equal to the average of the product of two random variables and is defined as
cor(X,Y) = E[XY]
= ∫∞ −∞∫∞ −∞ xyf(x,y)dxdy
This is the definition of covariance, not correlation.

So, if the above equation seems to be correct, then I can define H1(t) as X and H2(t) as Y.
Can I work like this depending on the above?
To obtain Cov(X,Y), yes.


And for a given set of variables, we use the correlation coefficient to give us the linear relationship between our variables. The correlation coefficient of two variables is defined in terms of their covariance and standard deviations, as seen below
ρ= cor(X,Y)/σχ σΥ
The correct formula is ρ = Cov(X,Y)/(σχ σΥ) where ρ is the correlation coefficient between X and Y.

If there is no relationship between the variables then the correlation coefficient will be zero and if there is a perfect positive match it will be one.
If there is a perfect inverse relationship, where one set of variables increases while the other decreases, then the correlation coefficient will be negative one.
Correct.

So, my second equastion is how to find the mean and variance for H1(t) and H2(t)
Hint: if Hn(t)= (-1)^n cos(2π fc t)* e^[(t^2)/4] *d^n/dt^n *e^[(t^2)/4]

Thanks alot!!
You should follow the approach in this post: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=1387935#post1387935
 

Related Threads on Study the autocorrelation function

  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
813
Replies
1
Views
465
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
30K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
4K
Top