Sturm-Liouville (can someone tell me if this is right?)

  • Thread starter Thread starter EngageEngage
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a Sturm-Liouville problem involving a second-order differential equation with boundary conditions. The original poster presents their solution and expresses uncertainty about its correctness, particularly regarding the nature of the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the boundary conditions and the variable mix-up between x and t. There is discussion about the nature of the solutions for different values of lambda and the conditions under which eigenvalues can be determined.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively clarifying the problem setup and discussing the implications of their findings. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of the boundary conditions and the process of finding eigenvalues. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationship between the constants and the solutions.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the independent variable and boundary conditions, which may affect the interpretation of the problem. The original poster acknowledges a mistake in their initial setup, and there are questions about the completeness of the information needed to solve for constants.

EngageEngage
Messages
203
Reaction score
0
Hi, I solved a simple Sturm-Liouville problem and not sure if its right or not because the answer is odd. I was hoping someone could tell me if I did it right.

[tex] \frac{d^{2}u}{dt^{2}}=\lambda u, 0<x<L, \frac{du}{dx}(0) = 0, u(0)=L[/tex]

[tex]\lambda > 0[/tex]
[tex] u = c_{1}cosh(\sqrt{\lambda}x)+c_{2}sinh(\sqrt{\lambda}x)[/tex]
[tex] \frac{du}{dx} = c_{1}\sqrt{\lambda}sinh(\sqrt{\lambda}x)+c_{2}\sqrt{\lambda}cosh(\sqrt{\lambda}x)[/tex]
[tex] \frac{du}{dx}(0) = c_{2}=0;<br /> u(0)=u(L)\Rightarrow c_{1}cosh(\sqrt{\lambda}x)=c_{1}[/tex]
It appears I can't find c1 unless i did something wrong...

[tex]\lambda = 0[/tex]
[tex]u = c_{1}+c_{2}x[/tex]
[tex]\frac{du}{dx}(0) = 0\Rightarrow c_{1}=0[/tex]
[tex]u(L) = u(0) \Rightarrow c_{2}=0[/tex]

[tex]\lambda < 0[/tex]
[tex]u = c_{1}cos(\sqrt{\lambda}x)+c_{2}sin(\sqrt{\lambda}x)[/tex]
[tex]\frac{du}{dx}(0) = \sqrt{lambda}c_{2}cos(\sqrt{\lambda}0) \Rightarrow c_{2}=0[/tex]
[tex]u(0) = u(L) \Rightarrow c_{1}=c_{1}cos(\sqrt{\lambda}L)[/tex]
[tex]\lambda = \left(\frac{arccos(1)}{L}\right)^{2}[/tex]
[tex]u = cos\left(\frac{arccos(1)x}{L}\right)[/tex]
is that right? I've never seen an answer like that... Any help is appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey Engage,

Before I dive too much further into helping you out, we need to clarify some things about your initial problem:

You have written:
[tex] \frac{d^{2}u}{dt^{2}}=\lambda u[/tex]

However, your boundary conditions are based on x, not t. If you are to solve this ODE, you'll find a solution in terms of t, of which you've continued in terms of x. Perhaps this is just a variable mix up? Perhaps it is the case that you wish to start out with the Laplacian of u?

Either way, it serves to clarify the situation.

Thanks,
Coto
 
EngageEngage said:
is that right?
You should be able to answer for yourself! You're trying to solve an equation, aren't you? Is your answer actually a solution to it?
 
yeah, I messed up the initial problem, the independent variable is x, not t.
[tex] <br /> \frac{d^{2}u}{dx^{2}}=\lambda u[/tex]
 
[tex]\lambda < 0[/tex]
makes the diff eq:
[tex] <br /> \frac{d^{2}u}{dx^{2}}=-\lambda u[/tex]
[tex] \frac{d}{dx}\left(-sin(arcos(1)\frac{x}{L})(\frac{arcos(1)}{L})\right)=<br /> -cos(arcos(1)\frac{x}{L})\left(\frac{arcos(1)}{L}\right)^2=-\lambda u[/tex]
... So i guess it is right... Thanks for the help! So does this mean there is only one eigenfunction then?
 
Hey Engage,

I suggest you take a look at your last step, where you solve for lambda. The idea is there, but you've overstepped what you should have done.

My suggestion is to divide out the c1's such that you have:
[tex] c_{1}=c_{1}cos(\sqrt{\lambda}L) \rightarrow 1 = cos(\sqrt{\lambda}L)[/tex]

So then what does the argument of cosine have to be such that cos of that is always one. This is in general the way you solve these problems. You want to find the eigenvalues lambda such that this argument always holds. For finite boundary conditions, lambda is discrete.

Hopefully this helps.
Coto
 
PS. It seems you do not have enough information to solve for the constant.
 
And is it u(0) = u(L) or u(0) = L ?
 
its u(0) = u(L). Thanks for the help. Also, I'm not quite sure what you mean Coto in your post #6. I though thtis is what I did to find lambda. did i mess that up? Thank you all for the help! Ahh, i see so arcos(1) will be 2*pi*n where n is any integer including zero, is that correct?
 
  • #10
so
[tex] \lambda_{n} = \left(\frac{2n\pi}{L}\right)^{2}[/tex]
[tex] u_{n} = cos\left(\frac{2n\pi x}{L}\right)[/tex]
[tex] u =\sum^{\infty}_{n=0}cos\left(\frac{2n\pi x}{L}\right)[/tex]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K