MHB How Do You Solve cosh(x) = 3 for x?

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To solve the equation cosh(x) = 3, the identity cosh(x) = (e^x + e^(-x))/2 is used. By rearranging and multiplying the equation by 2e^x, it transforms into a quadratic form: e^(2x) - 6e^x + 1 = 0. Applying the quadratic formula yields e^x = 3 ± 2√2, leading to the solutions x = ln(3 ± 2√2). The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly interpreting the problem as solving for x rather than evaluating cosh(3).
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
find x
$\displaystyle\frac{e^x+e^{-x}}{2}=3$

ok we have the indenty of

$$\displaystyle\cosh{x}=\frac{e^x+e^{-x}}{2}$$

presume then the x can be replaced by 3

$$\displaystyle\cosh{3}=\frac{e^3+e^{-3}}{2}$$

ok $W\vert A$ returns

$x = \ln(3 \pm 2 \sqrt 2)$

ok so how??
 

Attachments

  • cup_t.png
    cup_t.png
    960 bytes · Views: 103
Mathematics news on Phys.org
karush said:
find x
$\displaystyle\frac{e^x+e^{-x}}{2}=3$

ok we have the indenty of

$$\displaystyle\cosh{x}=\frac{e^x+e^{-x}}{2}$$

presume then the x can be replaced by 3

$$\displaystyle\cosh{3}=\frac{e^3+e^{-3}}{2}$$

ok $W\vert A$ returns

$x = \ln(3 \pm 2 \sqrt 2)$

ok so how??

What I would do is multiply the original equation by \(2e^x\) so that we have:

$$e^{2x}+1=6e^x$$

Arrange in standard quadratic form:

$$e^{2x}-6e^x+1=0$$

Apply quadratic formula:

$$e^x=\frac{-(-6)\pm\sqrt{(-6)^2-4(1)(1)}}{2(1)}=\frac{6\pm\sqrt{32}}{2}=3\pm2\sqrt{2}$$

Both roots are positive, thus:

$$x=\ln\left(3\pm2\sqrt{2}\right)$$
 
What you are "doing wrong" is that you are "going the wrong way"!

You titled this "Evaluate cosh(3)" and that is what you did. But the problem you state is to solve cosh(x)= 3 for x.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
11K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
11K
Back
Top