Subtle error in numeracy test question?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Outlined
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Error Test
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a numeracy test question where the calculation of average costs per employee is debated. One participant argues that the average cost per employee per year does not provide sufficient information to determine the number of employees in the first quarter, as employee numbers can vary by quarter. Another participant insists that averages can be used to make reasonable assumptions for calculations, suggesting that the average cost per employee per quarter can be derived from the annual figure. The conversation highlights the complexities of interpreting averages and the importance of making assumptions in test scenarios. Ultimately, the debate underscores the need for clarity in understanding how averages function in different contexts.
Outlined
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
25j8sj5.png


They say the answer is 41412 / (1392 / 4) = 119.
I think you cannot say as they gave the average cost per employee per year so you know nothing about the cost per employee per year in the 1st Q so you cannot decide how many employees you got that quarter.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Outlined! :wink:
Outlined said:
They say the answer is 41412 / (1392 / 4) = 119.
I think you cannot say as they gave the average cost per employee per year so you know nothing about the cost per employee per year in the 1st Q so you cannot decide how many employees you got that quarter.

But if you know the average cost per employee per year is 1392,

then the average cost per employee per quarter must be 1392/4. :smile:

What is worrying you about that? :confused:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi Outlined! :wink:


But if you know the average cost per employee per year is 1392,

then the average cost per employee per quarter must be 1392/4. :smile:

What is worrying you about that? :confused:

thanks for your reply, however the employees who work in Q1 are not necessarily the same as the one who work in Q2, Q3 or Q4. So you have to be cautious drawing conclusion from that.
 
it's an average! :smile:

what do you think averages are for?? :rolleyes:
 
let me give you a counterexample.

p1 is the number of people who work in Q1
pr is the number of people who work in Q2, Q3 and Q4.

Than the average costs per employee per year equals

1/4 * 1/p1 * 41412 + 3/4 *1/ pr * (167040 - 41412) = 1392

Two free variables so c1 can be everything!
 
Last edited:
I see what you mean Outlined. The cost per employee could have been different in Q1. But since it's a test question you have to make enough assumptions to be able to give an answer. If you were awesome you'd state those assumptions, like "I assume the average cost per employee per year is the same as if the average is taken only over 1st quarter." Well there's probably a nicer way to put it :P
 
thanks for your reply, however with most of this kind of quesitons you do not have to make assumptions. In fact, some of this kind of exercises have the option (it is always multiple choice) "cannot say".
 
tiny-tim said:
it's an average! :smile:

what do you think averages are for?? :rolleyes:
But anyone who thinks the average for the first 1/4 of a year must be equal to 1/4 the average for the year does not understand averages!
 

Similar threads

Back
Top