Subtleties about Hamilton's equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Harry Mason
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In a non-relativistic N-point particle system, Hamilton's equations describe time evolution based on the total internal energy. The discussion raises the question of the validity of Hamilton's equations when forces, such as electromagnetic forces, do not adhere to the third principle of dynamics and are non-conservative. It suggests that the Hamiltonian may require reinterpretation in these contexts. Specifically, for electrodynamics, the Hamiltonian must incorporate electric and magnetic potentials, leading to a coupled solution with Maxwell's equations. The complexity of this approach indicates unresolved issues in fully integrating these dynamics.
Harry Mason
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody,
from a non-relativistic point of view , taking into account an N-point particle isolated system, in which interacting with each others in principle we can describe the time-evolution of the system, defined by hamilton's equations:

9650ddf3b13f0cc286769092629ad1c9.png


Where H is the total internal energy of the sistem.

The question is: if forces between particles does not satisfy the 3rd principle of dynamic (like electromagnetic forces) and they're not conservative are the hamilton's equation always true? What's the new physical interpretation of the hamiltonian?

Thank you.
 
Not sure for dissipative system (but I found a link that might be helpful http://www.m-hikari.com/ams/ams-2010/ams-17-20-2010/biswasAMS17-20-2010.pdf)

But for the case of electrodynamics the thing is, in principle, like the following. For each particle You have to replace

P^2/2m

for

(P-eA(r,t))^2/2m+eV(r,t)

Where V (r,t) and A(r,t) are the electric and magnetic potentials and their dynamics is given by Maxwell's equations.

So, in principle to find the complete dynamics you have to solve at the same time the Maxwell's equations plus the Hamilton equation (they will be Newton equations with the Lorentz force), but this approach have a lot of problems that I think have not been solved so far.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top