Subtleties about Hamilton's equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Harry Mason
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In a non-relativistic N-point particle system, Hamilton's equations describe time evolution based on the total internal energy. The discussion raises the question of the validity of Hamilton's equations when forces, such as electromagnetic forces, do not adhere to the third principle of dynamics and are non-conservative. It suggests that the Hamiltonian may require reinterpretation in these contexts. Specifically, for electrodynamics, the Hamiltonian must incorporate electric and magnetic potentials, leading to a coupled solution with Maxwell's equations. The complexity of this approach indicates unresolved issues in fully integrating these dynamics.
Harry Mason
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody,
from a non-relativistic point of view , taking into account an N-point particle isolated system, in which interacting with each others in principle we can describe the time-evolution of the system, defined by hamilton's equations:

9650ddf3b13f0cc286769092629ad1c9.png


Where H is the total internal energy of the sistem.

The question is: if forces between particles does not satisfy the 3rd principle of dynamic (like electromagnetic forces) and they're not conservative are the hamilton's equation always true? What's the new physical interpretation of the hamiltonian?

Thank you.
 
Not sure for dissipative system (but I found a link that might be helpful http://www.m-hikari.com/ams/ams-2010/ams-17-20-2010/biswasAMS17-20-2010.pdf)

But for the case of electrodynamics the thing is, in principle, like the following. For each particle You have to replace

P^2/2m

for

(P-eA(r,t))^2/2m+eV(r,t)

Where V (r,t) and A(r,t) are the electric and magnetic potentials and their dynamics is given by Maxwell's equations.

So, in principle to find the complete dynamics you have to solve at the same time the Maxwell's equations plus the Hamilton equation (they will be Newton equations with the Lorentz force), but this approach have a lot of problems that I think have not been solved so far.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top