Medical Suffering from Kidney Stones: My Story

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimmy Snyder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    stones
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around personal experiences with kidney stones, highlighting the intense pain associated with passing them and the various treatments available. Participants share their histories of kidney stones, with some having undergone surgical procedures, including laser treatments and ultrasound. Dietary changes are frequently mentioned as preventive measures, with recommendations to increase water intake and avoid certain foods, particularly those high in oxalates and uric acid. The pain of passing stones is described as excruciating, often compared to childbirth, and many discuss the challenges of managing pain with medications like oxycodone, which can have unpleasant side effects. Some participants note the importance of regular check-ups with urologists to monitor stone growth and explore potential preventive medications. The conversation also touches on the emotional and physical toll of recurrent stones, with anecdotes illustrating the lengths individuals have gone to alleviate pain during episodes. Overall, the thread serves as a support network for those suffering from kidney stones, offering shared experiences and advice on coping strategies.
  • #51
Jimmy Snyder said:
The passage through the 'sensitive part' is painless, the pain is during the passage through the ureter, the tube from the kidney to the bladder. I think that's the same in men and women. Perhaps I'll get a sex change operation and settle the matter once and for all.

This confirms what my doctor says. He insists the pain comes from it temporary blocking urine from passing through the ureters. He says without the blockage, you would not feel anything, which is why I do not feel most of my stones. I have large ureters and thus the stones can pass through them with ease.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #52
Louise M said:
This confirms what my doctor says. He insists the pain comes from it temporary blocking urine from passing through the ureters. He says without the blockage, you would not feel anything, which is why I do not feel most of my stones. I have large ureters and thus the stones can pass through them with ease.
Yes, I'm pretty sure that the intense pain of a kidney stone is caused by the blockage of the ureter. However, I've been told that if the stone scrapes along as it goes, that can cause pain too. The urethra, the tube from the bladder to the outside has a larger diameter and that's why it doesn't hurt there. I had a stone that caused severe blockage on my right side about a decade ago and as a result the ureter ballooned out to 4 times its normal diameter. It never shrank back down so stones that pass on that side do so painlessly. Today I had my stone removed by snaking a laser to the site and using it to slice up the stone. Until today, I thought that the term lithotripsy referred to the breaking up of kidney stones by means of ultrasound. However, my doctor told me that lithotripsy just means stone breaking and today's procedure was called laser lithotripsy. He removed the stone and put a stent in its place. As a result, I have to go back to his office in a week to have it removed. The stent is no picnic and while the pain is not as intense, it is the same kind of pain as the stone.
 
  • #53
Jimmy Snyder said:
Yes, I'm pretty sure that the intense pain of a kidney stone is caused by the blockage of the ureter. However, I've been told that if the stone scrapes along as it goes, that can cause pain too. The urethra, the tube from the bladder to the outside has a larger diameter and that's why it doesn't hurt there. I had a stone that caused severe blockage on my right side about a decade ago and as a result the ureter ballooned out to 4 times its normal diameter. It never shrank back down so stones that pass on that side do so painlessly. Today I had my stone removed by snaking a laser to the site and using it to slice up the stone. Until today, I thought that the term lithotripsy referred to the breaking up of kidney stones by means of ultrasound. However, my doctor told me that lithotripsy just means stone breaking and today's procedure was called laser lithotripsy. He removed the stone and put a stent in its place. As a result, I have to go back to his office in a week to have it removed. The stent is no picnic and while the pain is not as intense, it is the same kind of pain as the stone.

Oh wow, that sounds like a horrible experience - so sorry, Jimmy! I hope they gave you good drugs, and also that the removal goes smoothly.
 
  • #54
If I remember correctly, there is a tiny string attached to the stent. All they have to do is grab the string and pull it out. Again, if I remember correctly, it can be done in the doctors office without any anesthesia
 
  • #55
Louise M said:
If I remember correctly, there is a tiny string attached to the stent. All they have to do is grab the string and pull it out. Again, if I remember correctly, it can be done in the doctors office without any anesthesia
:eek:
 
  • #56
Evo said:
:eek:

My sentiments exactly!
 
  • #57
Louise M said:
If I remember correctly, there is a tiny string attached to the stent. All they have to do is grab the string and pull it out. Again, if I remember correctly, it can be done in the doctors office without any anesthesia

:bugeye: *passes out*


I hope the procedure goes without a hiccup, Jimmy.
 
  • #58
Dembadon said:
:bugeye: *passes out*


I hope the procedure goes without a hiccup, Jimmy.
It's probably no more painful than a rapid tear involved in Brazilian bikini-wax. Though gender-specific issues limit my expertise.
 
  • #59
Jimmy Snyder said:
Yes, I'm pretty sure that the intense pain of a kidney stone is caused by the blockage of the ureter. However, I've been told that if the stone scrapes along as it goes, that can cause pain too. The urethra, the tube from the bladder to the outside has a larger diameter and that's why it doesn't hurt there. I had a stone that caused severe blockage on my right side about a decade ago and as a result the ureter ballooned out to 4 times its normal diameter. It never shrank back down so stones that pass on that side do so painlessly. Today I had my stone removed by snaking a laser to the site and using it to slice up the stone. Until today, I thought that the term lithotripsy referred to the breaking up of kidney stones by means of ultrasound. However, my doctor told me that lithotripsy just means stone breaking and today's procedure was called laser lithotripsy. He removed the stone and put a stent in its place. As a result, I have to go back to his office in a week to have it removed. The stent is no picnic and while the pain is not as intense, it is the same kind of pain as the stone.

I've had two kidney stones and when it goes through that ureter, boy is it painful. I don't know how someone could go through that without some kind of painkillers. It keeps getting worse and worse. I think you'd eventually black out. I don't know why there's so many nerves in that little tube.
However, I didn't even feel them come out, so going through the urethra wasn't a problem. I don't know if it's just a myth that it's painful coming out or what, because if it's painful coming out, then how in the world did it even fit through the ureter in the first place?
 
  • #60
leroyjenkens said:
I don't know if it's just a myth that it's painful coming out or what, because if it's painful coming out, then how in the world did it even fit through the ureter in the first place?
It's a one way street from the kidneys out.
 
  • #61
leroyjenkens said:
I've had two kidney stones and when it goes through that ureter, boy is it painful. I don't know how someone could go through that without some kind of painkillers. It keeps getting worse and worse. I think you'd eventually black out. I don't know why there's so many nerves in that little tube.
However, I didn't even feel them come out, so going through the urethra wasn't a problem. I don't know if it's just a myth that it's painful coming out or what, because if it's painful coming out, then how in the world did it even fit through the ureter in the first place?

I wonder if it's possible that the stones hang out in the bladder a while, and get larger while they're there?
 
  • #62
lisab said:
I wonder if it's possible that the stones hang out in the bladder a while, and get larger while they're there?

Should be easy to check jumping up and down - if they rattle, they are there.

Few years ago I was told I have stones, and I was given some fancy medication that makes you pee blue.
 
Last edited:
  • #63
Have you tried taking CoQ10?

It won't work on current stones, but should help prevent future ones.
 
  • #64
I didn't get the string. Instead, I went to the Doctor's office today and he went in and fished out the stent. I haven't been to work since Tuesday when he put it in. I've been pretty much in a drug induced stupor ever since. The stent is a tube that goes all the way from the kidney to the bladder. I think that when he pulled the stent he disturbed the stones in the kidney. Anyway now another stone is coming down and killing me so it's back to the drugs. I don't doubt I'll get fired over this.
 
  • #65
Jimmy Snyder said:
I didn't get the string. Instead, I went to the Doctor's office today and he went in and fished out the stent. I haven't been to work since Tuesday when he put it in. I've been pretty much in a drug induced stupor ever since. The stent is a tube that goes all the way from the kidney to the bladder. I think that when he pulled the stent he disturbed the stones in the kidney. Anyway now another stone is coming down and killing me so it's back to the drugs. I don't doubt I'll get fired over this.
If you have gall stones, they will just blow them all up with a laser because leaving them in there can damage the gall bladder. Is there a reason that they leave the kidney stones intact?
 
  • #66
Jimmy Snyder said:
I didn't get the string. Instead, I went to the Doctor's office today and he went in and fished out the stent. I haven't been to work since Tuesday when he put it in. I've been pretty much in a drug induced stupor ever since. The stent is a tube that goes all the way from the kidney to the bladder. I think that when he pulled the stent he disturbed the stones in the kidney. Anyway now another stone is coming down and killing me so it's back to the drugs. I don't doubt I'll get fired over this.

:frown: Ouch, dang! So sorry to hear of all this, it sounds really horrible.
 
  • #67
Poor Jimmy. I hope you will get better soon. When I read your serious posts I feel uneasy.
 
  • #68
Evo said:
If you have gall stones, they will just blow them all up with a laser because leaving them in there can damage the gall bladder. Is there a reason that they leave the kidney stones intact?
I had a stone removed that way and I might have these removed the same way. I've had stones broken up by ultrasound and laser, some passed on their own and some had to be pulled out. The laser treatment for stones in the kidney requires cutting a hole in the back, so it's considered a last resort. The ultrasound treatment is not considered when there is too much stone matter since the mass of fragments will clog the tube. They can't pull them from the kidney and mine won't pass on their own. I have an appointment in three months to discuss this matter with the urologist and we will decide what to do. Up til now I have been content to let the stones be, but a couple of them have grown to dangerous size and so I may submit to the laser treatment. If he recommends laser treatment and he can remove all of the stones along with the large ones in a single operation, then I will almost certainly go for it. Unfortunately, I have a half dozen stones in each kidney. Well, 5 on the left side now and one more in the ureter.
 
  • #69
Jimmy Snyder said:
I had a stone removed that way and I might have these removed the same way. I've had stones broken up by ultrasound and laser, some passed on their own and some had to be pulled out. The laser treatment for stones in the kidney requires cutting a hole in the back, so it's considered a last resort. The ultrasound treatment is not considered when there is too much stone matter since the mass of fragments will clog the tube. They can't pull them from the kidney and mine won't pass on their own. I have an appointment in three months to discuss this matter with the urologist and we will decide what to do. Up til now I have been content to let the stones be, but a couple of them have grown to dangerous size and so I may submit to the laser treatment. If he recommends laser treatment and he can remove all of the stones along with the large ones in a single operation, then I will almost certainly go for it. Unfortunately, I have a half dozen stones in each kidney. Well, 5 on the left side now and one more in the ureter.
When this happened to my cat, they *cured* him by giving him a sex change operation. Of course he was completely blocked, and the vet screwed up. Just saying you've got options.

On the serious side, it sounds like you're going through hell and I am really sorry to hear it. I do hope that they can find some way of getting this cleared up.
 
Last edited:
  • #70
Evo said:
Just saying you've got options.
I've been considering it since I heard someone say women suffer less than men. Actually, I had never heard that before. What I did hear was that kidney stone pain is worse than birth pain. I wouldn't know, but my mother passed a stone while she was in the hospital having given birth to me. She said that the stone was worse. On occasion I have worried that I would pass a stone while senile and not be able to tell anyone. Well, when my mother died, she wasn't senile, but she was passing a stone.
 
  • #71
My former foreman's wife had a stone ultrasonically fragmented. She already had two children (both in HS by that time), and was screaming in pain when the stone passed to the bladder. My foreman was ready to assault the attending physician because his wife was not getting pain-killers strong enough to keep her out of pain. According to her, giving birth was not even close to passing stones.
 
  • #72
Which type of stone are you forming jimmy? I just read up on them for the last 5 minutes, so I am an expert now.
 
  • #73
Evo said:
Which type of stone are you forming jimmy? I just read up on them for the last 5 minutes, so I am an expert now.
I have a long and illustrious history of kidney stones.
The first stone I passed was probably when I first had sex. I didn't know it was a stone at the time, I thought that my ball had turned upside down. Anyway she wanted me to finish up what I had started and I just wanted to roll over and die.
The second stone occurred just after I had a bout of hepatitis. I told the doctor that I had a relapse because my urine was brown again. He said that it was blood. He cut me and took out a stone made of uric acid. He said I should take alipurinol (sp?) and I did for a while, but when I moved to Japan I stopped.
I passed a few sporadic stones after that. They were painful, but I didn't treat them and they all passed.
When I got back to the states, I had one that got stuck in my ureter and ballooned it out. That one was made of calcium. My urologist put me through a bunch of tests including a 24 hour urine test, but he said the results were inconclusive. He couldn't say what was causing the stones nor could he recommend any treatment, dietary or otherwise.
After that I had couple of stones removed by ultrasound lithotripsy. then I started passing stones at the rate of about 2 a year and not seeing the urologist since they all passed without discomfort. I hated all the treatments and since there was no pain, I figured there was no problem. During those years a huge stone was growing in my kidney reaching to an inch in diameter. That was removed by laser lithotripsy through a hole in my back.
Since then I have had an x-ray and ultrasound (not lithotripsy, just a picture to see if the stone was a boy or a girl) every year. My doctor looks at the stones, tells me there's a few more than last year, they're growing and do I want to do anything about it? I say no, he says ok, and so another year goes by.
Now he says there are too many stones in there to leave alone and some are too large for ultrasound lithotripsy and I should have them treated. He didn't say so, but I know he means laser lithotripsy. Another hole in the back, perhaps two. He also said that he wants to repeat the tests to find out why I produce so many stones. His facial expression was like mine when there's a problem I want to solve and can't move on until I do. That's where matters stand now.
I am passing a stone as I write this. I was in considerable pain an hour ago, but I took my pain killer and either the stone has settled into a comfortable spot, or the pain killer kicked in, I don't know which. If I need more pain killer then I won't be able to work tomorrow.
 
  • #74
Jimmy Snyder said:
I have a long and illustrious history of kidney stones.
The first stone I passed was probably when I first had sex. I didn't know it was a stone at the time, I thought that my ball had turned upside down. Anyway she wanted me to finish up what I had started and I just wanted to roll over and die.
The second stone occurred just after I had a bout of hepatitis. I told the doctor that I had a relapse because my urine was brown again. He said that it was blood. He cut me and took out a stone made of uric acid. He said I should take alipurinol (sp?) and I did for a while, but when I moved to Japan I stopped.
I passed a few sporadic stones after that. They were painful, but I didn't treat them and they all passed.
When I got back to the states, I had one that got stuck in my ureter and ballooned it out. That one was made of calcium. My urologist put me through a bunch of tests including a 24 hour urine test, but he said the results were inconclusive. He couldn't say what was causing the stones nor could he recommend any treatment, dietary or otherwise.
After that I had couple of stones removed by ultrasound lithotripsy. then I started passing stones at the rate of about 2 a year and not seeing the urologist since they all passed without discomfort. I hated all the treatments and since there was no pain, I figured there was no problem. During those years a huge stone was growing in my kidney reaching to an inch in diameter. That was removed by laser lithotripsy through a hole in my back.
Since then I have had an x-ray and ultrasound (not lithotripsy, just a picture to see if the stone was a boy or a girl) every year. My doctor looks at the stones, tells me there's a few more than last year, they're growing and do I want to do anything about it? I say no, he says ok, and so another year goes by.
Now he says there are too many stones in there to leave alone and some are too large for ultrasound lithotripsy and I should have them treated. He didn't say so, but I know he means laser lithotripsy. Another hole in the back, perhaps two. He also said that he wants to repeat the tests to find out why I produce so many stones. His facial expression was like mine when there's a problem I want to solve and can't move on until I do. That's where matters stand now.
I am passing a stone as I write this. I was in considerable pain an hour ago, but I took my pain killer and either the stone has settled into a comfortable spot, or the pain killer kicked in, I don't know which. If I need more pain killer then I won't be able to work tomorrow.
OY!

Geeze, you poor thing. Are you able to sleep enough? When I started having recurring problems that caused me to be calling in every couple of days, my boss told me to go out on disability, he said it would be easier on him if he knew I wasn't coming in and he could assign people to handle my clients, plus short term disability is at 100% of pay. I know how hard it is to be ill and keep dragging yourself in on days when you can barely function.

I hope you and your doctor find something to help soon.
 
  • #75
Laser is not usually used for gall stones, (less than 15% are candidates for gall stone lithotripsy. This site tell tells the most common tx for gall stones.
http://www.uihealthcare.com/topics/digestivesystem/dige3507.html

Laser is usually the option of choice for kidney stones. No cutting into the skin is necessary as the scope goes up the urethra into the bladder and up the selected ureter and then blasted with the laser beam to break it up. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy http://www.kidney.org/atoz/content/lithotripsy.cfm is becoming a very infrequently treatment for renal calc.
 
  • #76
Tsu said:
Laser is not usually used for gall stones, (less than 15% are candidates for gall stone lithotripsy. This site tell tells the most common tx for gall stones.
http://www.uihealthcare.com/topics/digestivesystem/dige3507.html
The link is for gall bladder removal.

The last time I was hospitalized for gall stones, 20+ years ago, the doctor said that destroying them with a laser was the way to go. Googling it, it seems that 20 years ago, that seemed to be gaining poularity, but now it seems the consensus is to just remove the gallbladder instead of removing the stones. Ayway, I stopped having attacks and my gall bladder seems fine.
 
  • #77
Tsu said:
Laser is usually the option of choice for kidney stones. No cutting into the skin is necessary as the scope goes up the urethra into the bladder and up the selected ureter and then blasted with the laser beam to break it up.
Laser lithotripsy is the name of the procedure I just underwent. As you say, no cutting. The doctor said he would cut the stone up, he didn't mention blasting. Blasting makes it seem like ultrasound lithotripsy. Anyway, this stone was in the ureter just a centimeter from the bladder. The one-inch diameter stone was in the kidney and was also removed by laser lithotripsy. In that case I was cut and a tube passed into the kidney through my back.
 
  • #78
Evo said:
The link is for gall bladder removal.

The last time I was hospitalized for gall stones, 20+ years ago, the doctor said that destroying them with a laser was the way to go. Googling it, it seems that 20 years ago, that seemed to be gaining poularity, but now it seems the consensus is to just remove the gallbladder instead of removing the stones. Ayway, I stopped having attacks and my gall bladder seems fine.

No, the link is for surgical treatment of gallSTONES. See title at the top. But, you're right about it being an outdated treatment and today we either go up the duct and 'basket' the stone or just remove the whole gallbag. http://www.uptodate.com/patients/content/topic.do?topicKey=~200KeMfoEiZvZ1 .


Jimmy Snyder said:
Laser lithotripsy is the name of the procedure I just underwent. As you say, no cutting. The doctor said he would cut the stone up, he didn't mention blasting. Blasting makes it seem like ultrasound lithotripsy. Anyway, this stone was in the ureter just a centimeter from the bladder. The one-inch diameter stone was in the kidney and was also removed by laser lithotripsy. In that case I was cut and a tube passed into the kidney through my back.

There is confusion here. Probably on my part... :biggrin: In the OR, the term "lithotripsy" is usually of the extracorporeal (meaning outside of the the body) shock wave type which does use ultrasound. The term we (meaning we xray people who do ALL of the the actual work of the hospital - the surgeon just stands there while we do all of the work :biggrin: No, REALLY! :smile:) use for 'laser lithotripsy' is 'retrograde pyelogram'. The one inch stone is (i think) pretty uncommon. We've blasted big stones up close to the kidney, but I never seen one actually IN the kidney. Was it causing hydronephrosis (blocking the urine up into the kidney)?
Here is a site that explains it well... http://www.ucurology.net/minimallyinvasive/kid_ure_blad_stone.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #79
Tsu said:
No, the link is for surgical treatment of gallSTONES. See title at the top.
Yeah, but the treatment it describes is surgical removal of the entire gallbladder. :-p That apparently *is* the treatment nowdays, they no longer remove just the stones. So I was saying you're right.
 
  • #80
Tsu said:
There is confusion here. Probably on my part... :biggrin: In the OR, the term "lithotripsy" is usually of the extracorporeal (meaning outside of the the body) shock wave type which does use ultrasound. The term we (meaning we xray people who do ALL of the the actual work of the hospital - the surgeon just stands there while we do all of the work :biggrin: No, REALLY! :smile:) use for 'laser lithotripsy' is 'retrograde pyelogram'. The one inch stone is (i think) pretty uncommon. We've blasted big stones up close to the kidney, but I never seen one actually IN the kidney. Was it causing hydronephrosis (blocking the urine up into the kidney)?
I'm one week ahead of you. I had ultrasound lithotripsy twice and each time I only heard the term lithotripsy. So, like you, I associated the word lithotripsy with ultrasound. But two weeks ago, when I left the doctor's office, I noticed lithotripsy on my prescription. Since the urologist only mentioned the basket and the laser, I asked him about it just before the procedure and he said that the term lithotripsy just means stone breaking and includes both procedures.
Both times I had ultrasound lithotripsy, it was for stones in the kidney. Because I was producing stones sporadically before the treatment, but twice a year after, I conjectured that there is a drawback to this treatment. It creates a pile of sand in the kidney and not all of it passes. The sand that remains forms the seeds of future stones. Although this was only a conjecture, I have read a similar description on the web since and now I am fairly convinced that this is not a good procedure. If the stone is in the ureter, then the sand would naturally flow out so that would be ok.
The one inch stone was not causing hydronephrosis, but the urologist said that if left untreated it most likely would eventually do so.
 
  • #81
Evo said:
It's a one way street from the kidneys out.

Oh I wish mine was a one way street. Unfortunately, I have a two lane super highway. So my stones can go up and down as they see fit. Oh the fun of reflux.
 
  • #82
Louise M said:
Oh I wish mine was a one way street. Unfortunately, I have a two lane super highway. So my stones can go up and down as they see fit. Oh the fun of reflux.
I thought I had been through it all, but I have been spared this one.
I'm not 100% sure what's happening to me now. A few hours after the doctor removed the stent yesterday, I started having stone pain. Today, I have been passing gravel like crazy, I harvested 6 pieces with a sieve. The largest one is about 2 mm which is small as my stones go, but it might have caused the pain yesterday. I can still feel gravel rattling around in my bladder. I wouldn't have expected gravel to pass today as a result of the lithotripsy last week. The stent passes into the kidney and my guess would be that when the stent was released, it disturbed some stones in the kidney and they came tumbling down.
 
  • #83
Jimmy Snyder said:
I thought I had been through it all, but I have been spared this one.
I'm not 100% sure what's happening to me now. A few hours after the doctor removed the stent yesterday, I started having stone pain. Today, I have been passing gravel like crazy, I harvested 6 pieces with a sieve. The largest one is about 2 mm which is small as my stones go, but it might have caused the pain yesterday. I can still feel gravel rattling around in my bladder. I wouldn't have expected gravel to pass today as a result of the lithotripsy last week. The stent passes into the kidney and my guess would be that when the stent was released, it disturbed some stones in the kidney and they came tumbling down.
Not happy times, Jimmy! My thoughts are with you, friend.
 
  • #84
OTOH, the more you pass, the less you have inside. That's not bad in the end. My sympathy is with you, Jimmy.
 
  • #85
My sympathies with Jimmy too.

BTW there is a theory that calcium supplements without correcting vitamin D, vitamin K2 and magnesium deficiencies result in increased kidney stones.
Indiscriminate use of calcium supplements is now being increasingly blamed for a lot of things.
 
  • #86
Hopefully losing all of these stones is a good thing.
 
  • #87
Siv said:
My sympathies with Jimmy too.

I'm still waiting for the punchline. Sometimes Jimmy is too subtle even for me.
 
  • #88
DaveC426913 said:
I'm still waiting for the punchline. Sometimes Jimmy is too subtle even for me.
Aha ... interesting.
 
  • #89
Jimmy Snyder said:
I didn't get the string. Instead, I went to the Doctor's office today and he went in and fished out the stent. I haven't been to work since Tuesday when he put it in. I've been pretty much in a drug induced stupor ever since. The stent is a tube that goes all the way from the kidney to the bladder. I think that when he pulled the stent he disturbed the stones in the kidney. Anyway now another stone is coming down and killing me so it's back to the drugs. I don't doubt I'll get fired over this.

Jimmy,

Had a close friend that just went through what you are enduring with the stent. I have had only two bouts with these nasty things in the past six years, the first from being too dehydrated, the second from believe it or not stress of a close family member passing, happened on the day of his funeral. Passed them on my own both times.

My own personal strategy is that I "never", repeat "never" allow myself to become dehydrated anymore, get up at least twice a night and drink water, I know it is a PITA but knock on wood I haven't had another attack since 2006. Also, don't drink any diet soda or if I do drink alcohol, I prefer fine aged tequila, I drink plenty of water with it as well. The pain, and fear of the pain reoccurring is what made me radically change. So far it has been working, maybe drinking fluids may help you as well.

I really hope you find a strategy that works for you, you have had way too many episodes. I cringed while reading your thread. Good luck.

Rhody...
 
  • #90
Tsu said:
use for 'laser lithotripsy' is 'retrograde pyelogram'.

I thought a retrograde pyelogram was just the imaging procedure where the radioopaque dye is introduced through the bladder to get transported up to the kidneys to look for the location of blocked ureters (as opposed to anterograde pyelograms where the dye is injected IV to be excreted through the kidney for imaging).

I'm pretty impressed with a 1" stone. I've never seen a kidney with room for a 1" stone before, and am surprised it isn't entirely blocking urine output from that kidney. The mischief the stones get into is because they have room to grow in part of the collecting system of the kidney called the renal pelvis, which is basically a big waiting room right before the narrow ureter starts. Really a bad design, because the stones can grow and fit in that renal pelvis and then don't fit down the ureter itself.

Sorry you're going through so much pain, Jimmy. If you're worried about your job, you might want to look into FEMLA rules to see if your extended medical treatment qualifies you for job protection under that law.
 
  • #91
Hey Jimmy or any of the stone sufferers, just a curiosity question for you. Have any of you had your cystine levels measured or has any doctor ever used the word "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cystinuria" " with you?

A bit about cystinuria from the above link;

"Cystinuria is an inherited autosomal recessive[1] metabolic disorder that is characterized by the formation of cystine stones in the kidneys, ureter, and bladder. Cystinuria is a cause of persistent kidney stones. It is a disorder involving the defective transepithelial transport of cystine and dibasic amino acids in the kidney and intestine, and is one of many causes of kidney stones. If not treated properly, the disorder could cause serious damage to the kidneys and surrounding organs, and in some rare cases death. The stones may be identified by a positive nitroprusside cyanide test. The crystals are usually hexagonal, translucent, white. Upon removal, the stones may be pink or yellow in color, but later they turn to greenish due to exposure to air.Cystinuria is characterized by the inadequate reabsorption of cystine in the proximal convoluted tubules during the filtering process in the kidneys, thus resulting in an excessive concentration of this amino acid in the urine. Cystine may precipitate out of the urine, if the urine is neutral or acidic, and form crystals or stones in the kidneys, ureters, or bladder. It is one of several inborn errors of metabolism included in the Garrod's tetrad. The disorder is attributed to deficiency in transport and metabolism of amino acids."

I don't think much is known about the occurrence and epidemiology of the disease, as many of the amino acid transporter genetic defects are relatively new to science (thus could easily be over looked by a nephorlogist or urologist not up to date on their literature).

Anyway, since you seem have no cause for your stone problems, just possibly another avenue you could look into (this is not a diagnosis). Maybe you could even try an experiment with a low protein diet and see if that helps alleviate the formation of the stones (forgive me if this has been brought up or tried, I didn't read the whole topic).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #92
bobze said:
cystinuria
I'll bring this up with the urologist. I doubt that he hasn't heard of it though and he is seriously looking at all possibilities. I have harvested a large number of stones that I keep in a little jewel box. None of them has turned green.
 
  • #93
I passed a 2mm stone about two weeks ago and another 2mm one today. There are stones in my kidney now that are too big to pass and so on Feb 4th I'm going to have ultrasound lithotripsy to smash them up. I want them out of me before the 15th because I intend to change insurance companies at that time and I don't want these stones to be a pre-existing condition. Ultrasound lithotripsy doesn't remove stones, it just smashes them up into smaller smoother pieces which then hopefully pass out of the kidney. My stones tend to be jagged and the smoothing action will be appreciated. The idea is to smash them into pieces so small that if they leave the kidney and start down the ureter, they will not get stuck along the way. If they fail to leave the kidney, then I assume they will become the seeds of new large stones.
 
  • #94
Jimmy Snyder said:
I passed a 2mm stone about two weeks ago and another 2mm one today. There are stones in my kidney now that are too big to pass and so on Feb 4th I'm going to have ultrasound lithotripsy to smash them up. I want them out of me before the 15th because I intend to change insurance companies at that time and I don't want these stones to be a pre-existing condition. Ultrasound lithotripsy doesn't remove stones, it just smashes them up into smaller smoother pieces which then hopefully pass out of the kidney. My stones tend to be jagged and the smoothing action will be appreciated. The idea is to smash them into pieces so small that if they leave the kidney and start down the ureter, they will not get stuck along the way. If they fail to leave the kidney, then I assume they will become the seeds of new large stones.

You have my most sincere sympathy... visceral pain is miserable. Hang in there man.
 
  • #95
Jimmy,

I cringed when I read your post, hope the sonic waves make the little critters small enough to pass easily, if you don't mind me asking, have you changed your diet, lifestyle habits during this horrible ordeal, or are you one of the few rare folks who is more "prone" genetically to develop them ? I drink water in the middle of the night, every night, and never become dehydrated, have long since given up on any artificially sweetened soda, etc... It seems to keep them at bay, for me at least. I wish you the best, the pain is hard to bear. Stress seems to play a factor in me getting them as well, not that any of us can control all the stress in our lives.

Rhody...
 
  • #96
Thanks, but these last two weren't painful at all. I have a dilated ureter due to a really bad stone a while back. Stones that pass on my right are actually hard to detect until they hit the bladder. I had some extensive tests to determine why I make so many stones, but they was inconclusive. Most of my family has passed at least one stone, but no one passes them like I do, I average about two a year in a quiet year, and 9 in one year.
 
  • #97
Jimmy Snyder said:
Thanks, but these last two weren't painful at all. I have a dilated ureter due to a really bad stone a while back. Stones that pass on my right are actually hard to detect until they hit the bladder. I had some extensive tests to determine why I make so many stones, but they was inconclusive. Most of my family has passed at least one stone, but no one passes them like I do, I average about two a year in a quiet year, and 9 in one year.

Well, I'm glad you're in no pain!
 
  • #98
nismaratwork said:
Well, I'm glad you're in no pain!

nismara, Jimmy,

That kind of blows my mind, imagine having enough stones over the years for the urters to either adapt or be gouged to a larger diameter, quite remarkable I must say, and good for you which means little, no pain.

Rhody...

PS I hope you don't mind, but is their a correlation between passing more stones in a given year and your overall stress level being higher than normal, the science geek in me is curious ?
 
Last edited:
  • #99
rhody said:
nismara, Jimmy,

That kind of blows my mind, imagine having enough stones over the years for the urters to either adapt or be gouged to a larger diameter, quite remarkable I must say, and good for you which means little, no pain.

Rhody...

PS I hope you don't mind, but is their a correlation between passing more stones in a given year and your overall stress level being higher than normal, the science geek in me in curious ?

It's at times like that that I'm really pleased I'm a head man... :blushing:

I'd guess that the formation of stones is related to either some basic way that calcium is being metabolized, or more likely, there is some other source of sediment that serves as a nucleation site for NORMAL blood levels.

I'm just glad to see someone on top of their condition, and to adapt so well that you can pass stones without pain? I'm sorry you've had to pass so many, but that's definitely a decent 'super power'.

Actually, you should just tell people that this is your "mutant power"; you pass kidney stones without wincing, and often!
 
  • #100
rhody said:
imagine having enough stones over the years for the urters to either adapt or be gouged to a larger diameter

...

PS I hope you don't mind, but is their a correlation between passing more stones in a given year and your overall stress level being higher than normal, the science geek in me is curious ?
What happened about 10 years ago was that a fairly large stone left the kidney and started down the ureter but got stuck about 2/3 of the way to the bladder. It blocked up the tube so water could not pass and as a result the ureter, which is about the diameter of a pencil lead, dilated to about the diameter of a pencil. It never contracted and so stones that pass on my right are difficult to detect. By the way, the blockage of water is what causes the worst stone pain.

I don't know if there is a correlation between stress and the passing of stones.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top