Medical Suffering from Kidney Stones: My Story

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimmy Snyder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    stones
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around personal experiences with kidney stones, highlighting the intense pain associated with passing them and the various treatments available. Participants share their histories of kidney stones, with some having undergone surgical procedures, including laser treatments and ultrasound. Dietary changes are frequently mentioned as preventive measures, with recommendations to increase water intake and avoid certain foods, particularly those high in oxalates and uric acid. The pain of passing stones is described as excruciating, often compared to childbirth, and many discuss the challenges of managing pain with medications like oxycodone, which can have unpleasant side effects. Some participants note the importance of regular check-ups with urologists to monitor stone growth and explore potential preventive medications. The conversation also touches on the emotional and physical toll of recurrent stones, with anecdotes illustrating the lengths individuals have gone to alleviate pain during episodes. Overall, the thread serves as a support network for those suffering from kidney stones, offering shared experiences and advice on coping strategies.
  • #61
leroyjenkens said:
I've had two kidney stones and when it goes through that ureter, boy is it painful. I don't know how someone could go through that without some kind of painkillers. It keeps getting worse and worse. I think you'd eventually black out. I don't know why there's so many nerves in that little tube.
However, I didn't even feel them come out, so going through the urethra wasn't a problem. I don't know if it's just a myth that it's painful coming out or what, because if it's painful coming out, then how in the world did it even fit through the ureter in the first place?

I wonder if it's possible that the stones hang out in the bladder a while, and get larger while they're there?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #62
lisab said:
I wonder if it's possible that the stones hang out in the bladder a while, and get larger while they're there?

Should be easy to check jumping up and down - if they rattle, they are there.

Few years ago I was told I have stones, and I was given some fancy medication that makes you pee blue.
 
Last edited:
  • #63
Have you tried taking CoQ10?

It won't work on current stones, but should help prevent future ones.
 
  • #64
I didn't get the string. Instead, I went to the Doctor's office today and he went in and fished out the stent. I haven't been to work since Tuesday when he put it in. I've been pretty much in a drug induced stupor ever since. The stent is a tube that goes all the way from the kidney to the bladder. I think that when he pulled the stent he disturbed the stones in the kidney. Anyway now another stone is coming down and killing me so it's back to the drugs. I don't doubt I'll get fired over this.
 
  • #65
Jimmy Snyder said:
I didn't get the string. Instead, I went to the Doctor's office today and he went in and fished out the stent. I haven't been to work since Tuesday when he put it in. I've been pretty much in a drug induced stupor ever since. The stent is a tube that goes all the way from the kidney to the bladder. I think that when he pulled the stent he disturbed the stones in the kidney. Anyway now another stone is coming down and killing me so it's back to the drugs. I don't doubt I'll get fired over this.
If you have gall stones, they will just blow them all up with a laser because leaving them in there can damage the gall bladder. Is there a reason that they leave the kidney stones intact?
 
  • #66
Jimmy Snyder said:
I didn't get the string. Instead, I went to the Doctor's office today and he went in and fished out the stent. I haven't been to work since Tuesday when he put it in. I've been pretty much in a drug induced stupor ever since. The stent is a tube that goes all the way from the kidney to the bladder. I think that when he pulled the stent he disturbed the stones in the kidney. Anyway now another stone is coming down and killing me so it's back to the drugs. I don't doubt I'll get fired over this.

:frown: Ouch, dang! So sorry to hear of all this, it sounds really horrible.
 
  • #67
Poor Jimmy. I hope you will get better soon. When I read your serious posts I feel uneasy.
 
  • #68
Evo said:
If you have gall stones, they will just blow them all up with a laser because leaving them in there can damage the gall bladder. Is there a reason that they leave the kidney stones intact?
I had a stone removed that way and I might have these removed the same way. I've had stones broken up by ultrasound and laser, some passed on their own and some had to be pulled out. The laser treatment for stones in the kidney requires cutting a hole in the back, so it's considered a last resort. The ultrasound treatment is not considered when there is too much stone matter since the mass of fragments will clog the tube. They can't pull them from the kidney and mine won't pass on their own. I have an appointment in three months to discuss this matter with the urologist and we will decide what to do. Up til now I have been content to let the stones be, but a couple of them have grown to dangerous size and so I may submit to the laser treatment. If he recommends laser treatment and he can remove all of the stones along with the large ones in a single operation, then I will almost certainly go for it. Unfortunately, I have a half dozen stones in each kidney. Well, 5 on the left side now and one more in the ureter.
 
  • #69
Jimmy Snyder said:
I had a stone removed that way and I might have these removed the same way. I've had stones broken up by ultrasound and laser, some passed on their own and some had to be pulled out. The laser treatment for stones in the kidney requires cutting a hole in the back, so it's considered a last resort. The ultrasound treatment is not considered when there is too much stone matter since the mass of fragments will clog the tube. They can't pull them from the kidney and mine won't pass on their own. I have an appointment in three months to discuss this matter with the urologist and we will decide what to do. Up til now I have been content to let the stones be, but a couple of them have grown to dangerous size and so I may submit to the laser treatment. If he recommends laser treatment and he can remove all of the stones along with the large ones in a single operation, then I will almost certainly go for it. Unfortunately, I have a half dozen stones in each kidney. Well, 5 on the left side now and one more in the ureter.
When this happened to my cat, they *cured* him by giving him a sex change operation. Of course he was completely blocked, and the vet screwed up. Just saying you've got options.

On the serious side, it sounds like you're going through hell and I am really sorry to hear it. I do hope that they can find some way of getting this cleared up.
 
Last edited:
  • #70
Evo said:
Just saying you've got options.
I've been considering it since I heard someone say women suffer less than men. Actually, I had never heard that before. What I did hear was that kidney stone pain is worse than birth pain. I wouldn't know, but my mother passed a stone while she was in the hospital having given birth to me. She said that the stone was worse. On occasion I have worried that I would pass a stone while senile and not be able to tell anyone. Well, when my mother died, she wasn't senile, but she was passing a stone.
 
  • #71
My former foreman's wife had a stone ultrasonically fragmented. She already had two children (both in HS by that time), and was screaming in pain when the stone passed to the bladder. My foreman was ready to assault the attending physician because his wife was not getting pain-killers strong enough to keep her out of pain. According to her, giving birth was not even close to passing stones.
 
  • #72
Which type of stone are you forming jimmy? I just read up on them for the last 5 minutes, so I am an expert now.
 
  • #73
Evo said:
Which type of stone are you forming jimmy? I just read up on them for the last 5 minutes, so I am an expert now.
I have a long and illustrious history of kidney stones.
The first stone I passed was probably when I first had sex. I didn't know it was a stone at the time, I thought that my ball had turned upside down. Anyway she wanted me to finish up what I had started and I just wanted to roll over and die.
The second stone occurred just after I had a bout of hepatitis. I told the doctor that I had a relapse because my urine was brown again. He said that it was blood. He cut me and took out a stone made of uric acid. He said I should take alipurinol (sp?) and I did for a while, but when I moved to Japan I stopped.
I passed a few sporadic stones after that. They were painful, but I didn't treat them and they all passed.
When I got back to the states, I had one that got stuck in my ureter and ballooned it out. That one was made of calcium. My urologist put me through a bunch of tests including a 24 hour urine test, but he said the results were inconclusive. He couldn't say what was causing the stones nor could he recommend any treatment, dietary or otherwise.
After that I had couple of stones removed by ultrasound lithotripsy. then I started passing stones at the rate of about 2 a year and not seeing the urologist since they all passed without discomfort. I hated all the treatments and since there was no pain, I figured there was no problem. During those years a huge stone was growing in my kidney reaching to an inch in diameter. That was removed by laser lithotripsy through a hole in my back.
Since then I have had an x-ray and ultrasound (not lithotripsy, just a picture to see if the stone was a boy or a girl) every year. My doctor looks at the stones, tells me there's a few more than last year, they're growing and do I want to do anything about it? I say no, he says ok, and so another year goes by.
Now he says there are too many stones in there to leave alone and some are too large for ultrasound lithotripsy and I should have them treated. He didn't say so, but I know he means laser lithotripsy. Another hole in the back, perhaps two. He also said that he wants to repeat the tests to find out why I produce so many stones. His facial expression was like mine when there's a problem I want to solve and can't move on until I do. That's where matters stand now.
I am passing a stone as I write this. I was in considerable pain an hour ago, but I took my pain killer and either the stone has settled into a comfortable spot, or the pain killer kicked in, I don't know which. If I need more pain killer then I won't be able to work tomorrow.
 
  • #74
Jimmy Snyder said:
I have a long and illustrious history of kidney stones.
The first stone I passed was probably when I first had sex. I didn't know it was a stone at the time, I thought that my ball had turned upside down. Anyway she wanted me to finish up what I had started and I just wanted to roll over and die.
The second stone occurred just after I had a bout of hepatitis. I told the doctor that I had a relapse because my urine was brown again. He said that it was blood. He cut me and took out a stone made of uric acid. He said I should take alipurinol (sp?) and I did for a while, but when I moved to Japan I stopped.
I passed a few sporadic stones after that. They were painful, but I didn't treat them and they all passed.
When I got back to the states, I had one that got stuck in my ureter and ballooned it out. That one was made of calcium. My urologist put me through a bunch of tests including a 24 hour urine test, but he said the results were inconclusive. He couldn't say what was causing the stones nor could he recommend any treatment, dietary or otherwise.
After that I had couple of stones removed by ultrasound lithotripsy. then I started passing stones at the rate of about 2 a year and not seeing the urologist since they all passed without discomfort. I hated all the treatments and since there was no pain, I figured there was no problem. During those years a huge stone was growing in my kidney reaching to an inch in diameter. That was removed by laser lithotripsy through a hole in my back.
Since then I have had an x-ray and ultrasound (not lithotripsy, just a picture to see if the stone was a boy or a girl) every year. My doctor looks at the stones, tells me there's a few more than last year, they're growing and do I want to do anything about it? I say no, he says ok, and so another year goes by.
Now he says there are too many stones in there to leave alone and some are too large for ultrasound lithotripsy and I should have them treated. He didn't say so, but I know he means laser lithotripsy. Another hole in the back, perhaps two. He also said that he wants to repeat the tests to find out why I produce so many stones. His facial expression was like mine when there's a problem I want to solve and can't move on until I do. That's where matters stand now.
I am passing a stone as I write this. I was in considerable pain an hour ago, but I took my pain killer and either the stone has settled into a comfortable spot, or the pain killer kicked in, I don't know which. If I need more pain killer then I won't be able to work tomorrow.
OY!

Geeze, you poor thing. Are you able to sleep enough? When I started having recurring problems that caused me to be calling in every couple of days, my boss told me to go out on disability, he said it would be easier on him if he knew I wasn't coming in and he could assign people to handle my clients, plus short term disability is at 100% of pay. I know how hard it is to be ill and keep dragging yourself in on days when you can barely function.

I hope you and your doctor find something to help soon.
 
  • #75
Laser is not usually used for gall stones, (less than 15% are candidates for gall stone lithotripsy. This site tell tells the most common tx for gall stones.
http://www.uihealthcare.com/topics/digestivesystem/dige3507.html

Laser is usually the option of choice for kidney stones. No cutting into the skin is necessary as the scope goes up the urethra into the bladder and up the selected ureter and then blasted with the laser beam to break it up. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy http://www.kidney.org/atoz/content/lithotripsy.cfm is becoming a very infrequently treatment for renal calc.
 
  • #76
Tsu said:
Laser is not usually used for gall stones, (less than 15% are candidates for gall stone lithotripsy. This site tell tells the most common tx for gall stones.
http://www.uihealthcare.com/topics/digestivesystem/dige3507.html
The link is for gall bladder removal.

The last time I was hospitalized for gall stones, 20+ years ago, the doctor said that destroying them with a laser was the way to go. Googling it, it seems that 20 years ago, that seemed to be gaining poularity, but now it seems the consensus is to just remove the gallbladder instead of removing the stones. Ayway, I stopped having attacks and my gall bladder seems fine.
 
  • #77
Tsu said:
Laser is usually the option of choice for kidney stones. No cutting into the skin is necessary as the scope goes up the urethra into the bladder and up the selected ureter and then blasted with the laser beam to break it up.
Laser lithotripsy is the name of the procedure I just underwent. As you say, no cutting. The doctor said he would cut the stone up, he didn't mention blasting. Blasting makes it seem like ultrasound lithotripsy. Anyway, this stone was in the ureter just a centimeter from the bladder. The one-inch diameter stone was in the kidney and was also removed by laser lithotripsy. In that case I was cut and a tube passed into the kidney through my back.
 
  • #78
Evo said:
The link is for gall bladder removal.

The last time I was hospitalized for gall stones, 20+ years ago, the doctor said that destroying them with a laser was the way to go. Googling it, it seems that 20 years ago, that seemed to be gaining poularity, but now it seems the consensus is to just remove the gallbladder instead of removing the stones. Ayway, I stopped having attacks and my gall bladder seems fine.

No, the link is for surgical treatment of gallSTONES. See title at the top. But, you're right about it being an outdated treatment and today we either go up the duct and 'basket' the stone or just remove the whole gallbag. http://www.uptodate.com/patients/content/topic.do?topicKey=~200KeMfoEiZvZ1 .


Jimmy Snyder said:
Laser lithotripsy is the name of the procedure I just underwent. As you say, no cutting. The doctor said he would cut the stone up, he didn't mention blasting. Blasting makes it seem like ultrasound lithotripsy. Anyway, this stone was in the ureter just a centimeter from the bladder. The one-inch diameter stone was in the kidney and was also removed by laser lithotripsy. In that case I was cut and a tube passed into the kidney through my back.

There is confusion here. Probably on my part... :biggrin: In the OR, the term "lithotripsy" is usually of the extracorporeal (meaning outside of the the body) shock wave type which does use ultrasound. The term we (meaning we xray people who do ALL of the the actual work of the hospital - the surgeon just stands there while we do all of the work :biggrin: No, REALLY! :smile:) use for 'laser lithotripsy' is 'retrograde pyelogram'. The one inch stone is (i think) pretty uncommon. We've blasted big stones up close to the kidney, but I never seen one actually IN the kidney. Was it causing hydronephrosis (blocking the urine up into the kidney)?
Here is a site that explains it well... http://www.ucurology.net/minimallyinvasive/kid_ure_blad_stone.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #79
Tsu said:
No, the link is for surgical treatment of gallSTONES. See title at the top.
Yeah, but the treatment it describes is surgical removal of the entire gallbladder. :-p That apparently *is* the treatment nowdays, they no longer remove just the stones. So I was saying you're right.
 
  • #80
Tsu said:
There is confusion here. Probably on my part... :biggrin: In the OR, the term "lithotripsy" is usually of the extracorporeal (meaning outside of the the body) shock wave type which does use ultrasound. The term we (meaning we xray people who do ALL of the the actual work of the hospital - the surgeon just stands there while we do all of the work :biggrin: No, REALLY! :smile:) use for 'laser lithotripsy' is 'retrograde pyelogram'. The one inch stone is (i think) pretty uncommon. We've blasted big stones up close to the kidney, but I never seen one actually IN the kidney. Was it causing hydronephrosis (blocking the urine up into the kidney)?
I'm one week ahead of you. I had ultrasound lithotripsy twice and each time I only heard the term lithotripsy. So, like you, I associated the word lithotripsy with ultrasound. But two weeks ago, when I left the doctor's office, I noticed lithotripsy on my prescription. Since the urologist only mentioned the basket and the laser, I asked him about it just before the procedure and he said that the term lithotripsy just means stone breaking and includes both procedures.
Both times I had ultrasound lithotripsy, it was for stones in the kidney. Because I was producing stones sporadically before the treatment, but twice a year after, I conjectured that there is a drawback to this treatment. It creates a pile of sand in the kidney and not all of it passes. The sand that remains forms the seeds of future stones. Although this was only a conjecture, I have read a similar description on the web since and now I am fairly convinced that this is not a good procedure. If the stone is in the ureter, then the sand would naturally flow out so that would be ok.
The one inch stone was not causing hydronephrosis, but the urologist said that if left untreated it most likely would eventually do so.
 
  • #81
Evo said:
It's a one way street from the kidneys out.

Oh I wish mine was a one way street. Unfortunately, I have a two lane super highway. So my stones can go up and down as they see fit. Oh the fun of reflux.
 
  • #82
Louise M said:
Oh I wish mine was a one way street. Unfortunately, I have a two lane super highway. So my stones can go up and down as they see fit. Oh the fun of reflux.
I thought I had been through it all, but I have been spared this one.
I'm not 100% sure what's happening to me now. A few hours after the doctor removed the stent yesterday, I started having stone pain. Today, I have been passing gravel like crazy, I harvested 6 pieces with a sieve. The largest one is about 2 mm which is small as my stones go, but it might have caused the pain yesterday. I can still feel gravel rattling around in my bladder. I wouldn't have expected gravel to pass today as a result of the lithotripsy last week. The stent passes into the kidney and my guess would be that when the stent was released, it disturbed some stones in the kidney and they came tumbling down.
 
  • #83
Jimmy Snyder said:
I thought I had been through it all, but I have been spared this one.
I'm not 100% sure what's happening to me now. A few hours after the doctor removed the stent yesterday, I started having stone pain. Today, I have been passing gravel like crazy, I harvested 6 pieces with a sieve. The largest one is about 2 mm which is small as my stones go, but it might have caused the pain yesterday. I can still feel gravel rattling around in my bladder. I wouldn't have expected gravel to pass today as a result of the lithotripsy last week. The stent passes into the kidney and my guess would be that when the stent was released, it disturbed some stones in the kidney and they came tumbling down.
Not happy times, Jimmy! My thoughts are with you, friend.
 
  • #84
OTOH, the more you pass, the less you have inside. That's not bad in the end. My sympathy is with you, Jimmy.
 
  • #85
My sympathies with Jimmy too.

BTW there is a theory that calcium supplements without correcting vitamin D, vitamin K2 and magnesium deficiencies result in increased kidney stones.
Indiscriminate use of calcium supplements is now being increasingly blamed for a lot of things.
 
  • #86
Hopefully losing all of these stones is a good thing.
 
  • #87
Siv said:
My sympathies with Jimmy too.

I'm still waiting for the punchline. Sometimes Jimmy is too subtle even for me.
 
  • #88
DaveC426913 said:
I'm still waiting for the punchline. Sometimes Jimmy is too subtle even for me.
Aha ... interesting.
 
  • #89
Jimmy Snyder said:
I didn't get the string. Instead, I went to the Doctor's office today and he went in and fished out the stent. I haven't been to work since Tuesday when he put it in. I've been pretty much in a drug induced stupor ever since. The stent is a tube that goes all the way from the kidney to the bladder. I think that when he pulled the stent he disturbed the stones in the kidney. Anyway now another stone is coming down and killing me so it's back to the drugs. I don't doubt I'll get fired over this.

Jimmy,

Had a close friend that just went through what you are enduring with the stent. I have had only two bouts with these nasty things in the past six years, the first from being too dehydrated, the second from believe it or not stress of a close family member passing, happened on the day of his funeral. Passed them on my own both times.

My own personal strategy is that I "never", repeat "never" allow myself to become dehydrated anymore, get up at least twice a night and drink water, I know it is a PITA but knock on wood I haven't had another attack since 2006. Also, don't drink any diet soda or if I do drink alcohol, I prefer fine aged tequila, I drink plenty of water with it as well. The pain, and fear of the pain reoccurring is what made me radically change. So far it has been working, maybe drinking fluids may help you as well.

I really hope you find a strategy that works for you, you have had way too many episodes. I cringed while reading your thread. Good luck.

Rhody...
 
  • #90
Tsu said:
use for 'laser lithotripsy' is 'retrograde pyelogram'.

I thought a retrograde pyelogram was just the imaging procedure where the radioopaque dye is introduced through the bladder to get transported up to the kidneys to look for the location of blocked ureters (as opposed to anterograde pyelograms where the dye is injected IV to be excreted through the kidney for imaging).

I'm pretty impressed with a 1" stone. I've never seen a kidney with room for a 1" stone before, and am surprised it isn't entirely blocking urine output from that kidney. The mischief the stones get into is because they have room to grow in part of the collecting system of the kidney called the renal pelvis, which is basically a big waiting room right before the narrow ureter starts. Really a bad design, because the stones can grow and fit in that renal pelvis and then don't fit down the ureter itself.

Sorry you're going through so much pain, Jimmy. If you're worried about your job, you might want to look into FEMLA rules to see if your extended medical treatment qualifies you for job protection under that law.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
14K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K