MHB Sum of Series: Let $x$ with x^{2011}=1 & x$\ne$1

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series Sum
AI Thread Summary
The sum of the series $$S=\frac{x^2}{x-1}+\frac{x^4}{x^2-1}+\frac{x^6}{x^3-1}+\cdots+\frac{x^{4020}}{x^{2010}-1}$$ for a complex number $x$ satisfying $x^{2011}=1$ and $x\ne1$ simplifies to 1004. The derivation involves recognizing patterns in the series and using properties of complex numbers, particularly the relationships between powers of $x$. Key steps include pairing terms and applying geometric series formulas. The final result confirms that the sum converges to a specific integer value. Thus, the computed sum is $S=1004$.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Let $x$ be a complex number such that $$x^{2011}=1$$ and $x\ne1$.

Compute the sum $$\frac{x^2}{x-1}+\frac{x^4}{x^2-1}+\frac{x^6}{x^3-1}+\cdots+\frac{x^{4020}}{x^{2010}-1}$$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Let us first get rid of the doubled exponent on the numerator:

\[ \frac{x^{2n}}{x^n-1} = x^n \cdot \left(\frac{x^n}{x^n-1}\right) = x^n \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{x^n-1}\right)\]

So that we have

\[\sum_{k=1}^{2010}\frac{x^{2k}}{x^k-1}=\sum_{k=1}^{2010}x^k + \sum_{k=1}^{2010}\frac{x^k}{x^k-1}\]

and here we have $\sum_{k=1}^{2010}x^k = \frac{x-x^{2011}}{1-x} = \frac{x-1}{1-x}=-1$, hence we will concentrate on the term $\sum_{k=1}^{2010}\frac{x^k}{x^k-1}$.

Let us write $S = \sum_{k=1}^{2010}\frac{x^k}{x^k-1}$.

Note that $x^{2010} = x^{-1}$, thus $\frac{x^{2010} }{x^{2010} - 1} = \frac{x^{-1}}{x^{-1}-1} = \frac{1}{1-x} = - \frac{1}{x-1}$, and, in general we have $x^{2010-k} = x^{-k-1}$ thus
\[\frac{x^{2010-k}}{x^{2010-k}-1} = \frac{x^{-k-1}}{x^{-k-1}-1}=-\frac{1}{x^{k+1}-1}\]

Hence
\[S = \sum_{k=1}^{2010} \frac{x^k}{x^k-1} = \sum_{k=0}^{2009} \frac{x^{2010-k}}{x^{2010-k}-1} = - \sum_{k=0}^{2009}\frac{1}{x^{k+1}-1}= - \sum_{k=1}^{2010}\frac{1}{x^k-1}\]

so that
\[2S = \sum_{k=1}^{2010} \frac{x^k}{x^k - 1} - \sum_{k=1}^{2010}\frac{1}{x^k-1} = \sum_{k=1}^{2010}\frac{x^k-1}{x^k-1}=2010\]

thus $S = 1005$ and so
\[\sum_{k=1}^{2010}\frac{x^{2k}}{x^k-1}=1004\]
 
Last edited:
Let $x$ be a complex number such that $$x^{2011}=1$$ and $x\ne1$.

Compute the sum $$\frac{x^2}{x-1}+\frac{x^4}{x^2-1}+\frac{x^6}{x^3-1}+\cdots+\frac{x^{4020}}{x^{2010}-1}$$.

Hi PaulRS, thanks for participating and yes, your answer is correct.

My solution:

First, let $$S=\frac{x^2}{x-1}+\frac{x^4}{x^2-1}+\frac{x^6}{x^3-1}+\cdots+\frac{x^{4020}}{x^{2010}-1}$$.

We're told that $$x^{2011}=1$$. This implies

$$x^{4022}=1\;\rightarrow x^2(x^{4020})=1$$ or $$x^{4020}=\frac{1}{x^2}$$

From $$x^{4020}=\frac{1}{x^2}$$ we get

$$x^{2010}=\frac{1}{x}$$ and

$$x^{1005}=\frac{1}{x^{\frac{1}{2}}}$$

Now, if we collect the very first and last term from the given series, we see that
$$
\frac{x^2}{x-1}+\frac{x^{4020}}{x^{2010}-1}=\frac{x^2}{x-1}+\frac{\frac{1}{x^2}}{\frac{1}{x}-1}=\frac{x^2}{x-1}-\frac{1}{x(x-1)}=\frac{x^3-1}{x(x-1)}=\frac{(x-1)(x^2+x+1)}{x(x-1)}=x+1+\frac{1}{x}$$

By continue collecting the terms in this fashion we see that

$$S=\left(\frac{x^2}{x-1}+\frac{x^{4020}}{x^{2010}-1}\right)+\left(\frac{x^4}{x^2-1}+\frac{x^{4018}}{x^{2009}-1}\right)+\cdots+\left(\frac{x^{2010}}{x^{1005}-1}+\frac{x^{2012}}{x^{1006}-1}\right)$$

$$S=\left(x+1+\frac{1}{x}\right)+\left(x^2+1+\frac{1}{x^2}\right)+\cdots+\left(x^{1005}+1+\frac{1}{x^{1005}}\right)$$

$$S=1005+\left(x+x^2+\cdots+x^{1005}\right)+\left( \frac{1}{x}+\frac{1}{x^2}+\cdots+\frac{1}{x^{1005}} \right)$$

And since $$x^{1005}=\frac{1}{x^{\frac{1}{2}}}$$, we have $$x^{\frac{1}{2}}=\frac{1}{x^{1005}}$$; $$x(x^{\frac{1}{2}})=\frac{1}{x^{1004}}$$; $$x^2(x^{\frac{1}{2}})=\frac{1}{x^{1003}}$$ and so on and so forth...

$$\frac{1}{x}+\frac{1}{x^2}+\cdots+\frac{1}{x^{1005}}$$ becomes $$x^{\frac{1}{2}}(1+x+x^2+\cdots+x^{1004})$$ and

$$S=1005+\left(x+x^2+\cdots+x^{1005}\right)+\left( x^{\frac{1}{2}}(1+x+x^2+\cdots+x^{1004}) \right)$$

$$S=1005+\left(1+x+x^2+\cdots+x^{1004}\right)+\left( x^{\frac{1}{2}}(1+x+x^2+\cdots+x^{1004}) \right)-1+x^{1005}$$

$$S=1004+(1+x+x^2+\cdots+x^{1004})(1+ x^{\frac{1}{2}})+\frac{1}{x^{\frac{1}{2}}}$$(*)

I hope I don't confuse you, the reader at this point because I can tell my method is tedious and messy and also, quite confusing...:(

Notice that

$$x^{1005}=\frac{1}{x^{\frac{1}{2}}}$$

$$x^{1005}-1=\frac{1}{x^{\frac{1}{2}}}-1=-\left(\frac{x^{\frac{1}{2}}-1}{x^{\frac{1}{2}}} \right)$$

and since $x \ne 1$,

$$\frac{x^{1005}-1}{x-1}=-\left(\frac{x^{\frac{1}{2}}-1}{x^{\frac{1}{2}}(x-1)} \right)$$

$$\frac{(x-1)(x^{1004}+x^{1003}+\cdots+1)}{x-1}=-\left(\frac{x^{\frac{1}{2}}-1}{x^{\frac{1}{2}}(x^{\frac{1}{2}}-1)(x^{\frac{1}{2}}+1)} \right)$$

$$x^{1004}+x^{1003}+\cdots+1=-\left(\frac{1}{x^{\frac{1}{2}}(x^{\frac{1}{2}}+1)} \right)$$

Now, substitute this into the equation (*) we get

$$S=1004-\left(\frac{1}{x^{\frac{1}{2}}(x^{\frac{1}{2}}+1)} \right)(1+ x^{\frac{1}{2}})+\frac{1}{x^{\frac{1}{2}}}$$

$\therefore S=1004$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top