Sum of the powers of natural numbers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the formulas for the sums of powers of natural numbers, specifically highlighting the formulas for the first power and the second power. It mentions the general formula for the sum of the first n natural numbers as n(n+1)/2 and for the sum of squares as n(n+1)(2n+1)/6. The user seeks to understand the general formula for the sum of natural numbers raised to the power of a, referencing Faulhaber's formula and Bernoulli numbers. A simpler generalization for the sum of products is also presented, showing a pattern for sums involving products of consecutive integers. The conversation concludes with the user expressing gratitude for the information received.
pyfgcr
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone. I have learned that:
1+2+3+...=\frac{n(n+1)}{2}
12+22+32=\frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}
I want to know what the general formula of Ʃna, in which n and a are natural numbers, respect to n and a.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
See Faulhaber's formula (and the page about Bernoulli numbers, as they appear in the general formula).
 
Actually, a simpler generalization of
1+2+3+ ... = n(n+1)/2
is
1.2 + 2.3 + 3.4 + ... = n(n+1)(n+2)/3
1.2.3 + 2.3.4 + 3.4.5 + ... = n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)/4
etc.
 
Now I know. Thanks for the answer.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top