MHB Sum of Two Squares: Can $5^{64}-3^{64}$ Be Written?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Squares Sum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the expression $5^{64}-3^{64}$ can be represented as the sum of two squares. Participants reference the identity that states the product of two sums of squares can also be expressed as a sum of two squares. Dan expresses gratitude for contributions from others, including Kali and Opalg, who provided explanations and solutions. The conversation highlights the collaborative effort to explore this mathematical question. Ultimately, the focus remains on the mathematical properties related to sums of squares.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Is it possible to write $5^{64}-3^{64}$ as the sum of two squares?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Is it possible to write $5^{64}-3^{64}$ as the sum of two squares?

$5^{64}-3^{64}$
=$(5^{32}+3^{32})(5^{16}+3^{16})(5^8+3^8)(5^4+3^4)(5^2+3^2)(5+3)(5-3)$
= $16((5^{32}+3^{32})(5^{16}+3^{16})(5^8+3^8)(5^4+3^4)(5^2+3^2)$
= $4^2((5^{32}+3^{32})(5^{16}+3^{16})(5^8+3^8)(5^4+3^4)(5^2+3^2)$

as product of 2 numbers both sum of 2 squares can be represented as sum of 2 squares and 4^2 is a square so argument repeatedly we have the ans Yes
 
I'm not familiar with this theorem. Are you saying that any form [math](a^{2p} + b^{2p})(c^{2q} + d^{2q} )(e^{2r} + f^{2r})[/math] can always be written as the sum of two squares? Or do we additionally need c = e =a, d = f = b or something?
-Dan
 
topsquark said:
I'm not familiar with this theorem. Are you saying that any form [math](a^{2p} + b^{2p})(c^{2q} + d^{2q} )(e^{2r} + f^{2r})[/math] can always be written as the sum of two squares? Or do we additionally need c = e =a, d = f = b or something?
-Dan
[sp]
The identity $(a^2+b^2)(c^2+d^2) = (ac+bd)^2 + (ad-bc)^2$ shows that a product of sums of two squares is also a sum of two squares.
[/sp]
 
(Doh) I knew that one.

Thanks!

-Dan
 
Thanks Kali for your solution!

And thanks to Opalg too for explaining thing for topsquark! I appreciate that!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top