Summation Notation for Weak form of Differential Equation

bugatti79
Messages
786
Reaction score
4
Folks,

I am struggling to see what is happening here particularly when ## \displaystyle \sum_{i=1}^{n-1}## transforms into ##\displaystyle \int_{x_1^e}^{x_{n}^e}##

##\displaystyle 0=\sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \left [ \int_{x_i^e}^{x_{i+1}^e} (a \frac{dw}{dx} \frac{du}{dx}+cwu-wf )dx- \left [ w(x) a \frac{du}{dx} \right ]_{x_i^e}^{x_{i+1}^e} \right ]##

##\displaystyle =\int_{x_1^e}^{x_{n}^e} (a \frac{dw}{dx} \frac{du}{dx}+cwu-wf )dx -w(x_1^e) (-a \frac{du}{dx})_{x_1^e}-w(x_2^e) (a \frac{du}{dx})_{x_2^e}-w(x_2^e) (-a \frac{du}{dx})_{x_2^e}-w(x_3^e) (a \frac{du}{dx})_{x_3^e} ...-w(x_{n-1}^e) (-a \frac{du}{dx})_{x_{n-1}^e}-w(x_{n}^e) (a \frac{du}{dx})_{x_{n}^e}##

Could anyone shed some light on what is happening..?

Apparently it is carried out in intervals of ##(x_1^e, x_2^e), (x_2^e, x_3^e),(x_{n-1}^e, x_n^e)##

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I am no expert on this, but I think he's using a the property of integration
\int^{b}_{a} f + \int^{c}_{b} f = \int^{c}_{a} f
the intermediate terms are just writing out the [w(x)a\frac{du}{dx}]^{x^{e}_{i+1}}_{x^{e}_{i}} explicitly
 
dragonlorder said:
I am no expert on this, but I think he's using a the property of integration
\int^{b}_{a} f + \int^{c}_{b} f = \int^{c}_{a} f
the intermediate terms are just writing out the [w(x)a\frac{du}{dx}]^{x^{e}_{i+1}}_{x^{e}_{i}} explicitly

Thanks. That helps my interpretation. I knew the intermediate terms.
Regards
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top