Summing sets of inverses of integers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Doom of Doom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integers Sets
Doom of Doom
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
How can I prove this?

Suppose X is a set of 16 distinct positive integers, X=\left\{{x_{1}, \cdots , x_{16}}\right\}.
Then, for every X, there exists some integer k\in\left\{{1, \cdots , 8}\right\} and disjoint subsets A,B\subset X
A=\left\{a_{1},\cdots\ ,a_{k}\right\} and B=\left\{b_{1},\cdots\ ,b_{k}\right\}

such that \left|\alpha - \beta\right|<.00025,

where \alpha= \frac{1}{a_{1}}+\cdots+\frac{1}{a_{k}} and \beta= \frac{1}{b_{1}}+\cdots+\frac{1}{b_{k}}.


I know that .00025 is pretty close to 2^-12.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Which k, A, B, would you choose for X = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16} ? It might be me, but I don't seem to find any.
 
Well for a set of 16 ordered integers, how would you choose them to get the smallest difference? Think of variance of a set of data.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top