I am not convinced. There have been so many reports of higher Tc accompanied by noisy curves in the pase, most of them have turned out to be false.
Neither the susceptibilty data nor the resisitiviy is convincing. A transtion to a phase with magnetic ordering could -at least in principle- give the same results.
I guess they are just trying to convince us that a part of the sample goes superconducting (i.e. it is very inhomogenous) which means you would get a curve similar to what they show. The resisitive transition in high-Tc can look quite strange if the sample is very inhomogenous with some parts being normal, some parts superconducting but with varying degrees of under/overdoping. Susceptibilty data is usually "cleaner" since it is less local but in this case it is too noisy to draw any conclusions.
It would be interesting to see the result of a scan with a SQUID magnetometer.
The resisitive transition in high-Tc can look quite strange if the sample is very inhomogenous with some parts being normal, some parts superconducting...
But isn't this true of any type 2 SC between Tc1 and Tc2?
Well, yes and no. It is possible to see the "signature" of the mixed state in a measurement of the resistance; if the vortices are moving around you get a finite flux-flow resistance even after going below Tc. However, in reality this effect is tiny compared to the drop in resistance (and in order to see it clearly you need to cool the sample in a relatively large field) meaning the transition should still be very clear (the width of the transition is often used to measure the quality of a superconducting film, for e.g. a thin film of YBCO it should be about 1K).
In some cases several transitions can be seen; this happens e.g. if part of the sample has been damaged or oxygen depleted.
Morever, a susceptibility measurement is usually done at low fields with just a small AC coil meaning there shouldn't be many vortices moving around, one should therefore see a very clear vertical drop if the sample is reasonably homogenous.
I am new to XPS Data analysis, and I have a .sle file that I got out of XPS Machine Software, and I am using CasaXPS to analyse the data. This software takes only .vms files. I want to convert the .sle to a .vms file for analysis. How or where can I do this? Any help on this will be deeply appreciated.
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...