Superficial Love: Examining My Feelings

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Is Hard
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Love
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the complexities of romantic attraction, highlighting two main components: physical attraction and personality attraction. Participants reflect on personal experiences where initial infatuation faded upon discovering deeper personality flaws or physical repulsiveness, leading to the conclusion that superficial love is common. The conversation explores whether one type of attraction is more valuable than the other, with many suggesting that personality often holds greater importance. There is an acknowledgment that while physical attraction is significant, it can be compromised if the personality is compelling. The challenges of online dating are also discussed, emphasizing the potential for misjudgment based on idealized perceptions rather than reality. Ultimately, the consensus suggests that genuine love requires a balance of both physical and emotional connection, and that true love transcends superficiality.
  • #101
I thought they pumped oxygen into the forums to keep us awake - like they do in the hotel rooms in Las Vegas. Also, I'm pretty sure they put caffeine in the complimentary PF snacks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #102
Math Is Hard said:
I'm pretty sure they put caffeine in the complimentary PF snacks.
Snacks? What snacks? Nobody offered me any snacks! :cry: (You're not just trying to dispose of that furry birthday cake while continuing to test my gullibility, are you?) :rolleyes:
 
  • #103
Danger said:
Snacks? What snacks? Nobody offered me any snacks! :cry: (You're not just trying to dispose of that furry birthday cake while continuing to test my gullibility, are you?) :rolleyes:
Well, if you had stopped by the new member welcome tent, you could have picked up some fish.
 
  • #104
Evo said:
Well, if you had stopped by the new member welcome tent, you could have picked up some fish.
It just never crossed my mind to expect a Newfie greeting ceremony in a Yank forum. If you have Skreech too, I'm there! :biggrin:
 
  • #105
Danger said:
It just never crossed my mind to expect a Newfie greeting ceremony in a Yank forum. If you have Skreech too, I'm there! :biggrin:
Just some old fish and cereal. The_Bob is in charge of food. Where has he been lately? That fish is really getting smelly.
 
  • #106
jeez that was the fish? And here i was blaming Danger.

Nice av photo Evo!
 
  • #107
hypatia said:
jeez that was the fish? And here i was blaming Danger.
Well, a lot of that "is" danger.

Nice av photo Evo!
Nice pic of yourself in the member photo thread! I'd KILL for hair like that!
 
  • #108
hypatia said:
jeez that was the fish? And here i was blaming Danger.

Good thing you told me before I sent him to soak his feet in disinfectant! :eek:
 
  • #109
so umm.. back to original post

anyone else think its impossible to actually be in love?
 
  • #110
cronxeh said:
so umm.. back to original post

anyone else think its impossible to actually be in love?

franznietzsche said:
Given that i still refuse to believe in love: yes.

Even if i did, i would still say yes though, so i guess that's not really relevant.

No one ever listens to me...
 
  • #111
sorry fritz but anyone ELSE beside you :)

particularly from the female camp..
 
  • #112
cronxeh said:
sorry fritz but anyone ELSE beside you :)

particularly from the female camp..


Fritz?...
 
  • #113
I've experienced "real love". It makes you sick, it makes you vomit, and it makes you want to die. I highly recommend it. :frown:
 
  • #114
cronxeh said:
anyone else think its impossible to actually be in love?
I didn't until these showed up.

jeez that was the fish? And here i was blaming Danger.:frown:
Well, a lot of that "is" danger.:frown:

Now I think I'll just go back to my sheep. :cry:
 
  • #115
Evo said:
I've experienced "real love". It makes you sick, it makes you vomit, and it makes you want to die.
A couple of bottles of tequila can do the same thing, and it's a lot cheaper.
 
  • #116
franz.. not fritz :confused:
 
  • #117
Danger said:
A couple of bottles of tequila can do the same thing, and it's a lot cheaper.


Better really.

YOO HOO FOR THE CAPTAIN!
 
  • #118
cronxeh said:
franz.. not fritz :confused:
You're getting him confused with his brother the cat.
 
  • #119
franznietzsche said:
No one ever listens to me...
cronxeh said:
sorry fritz...
cronxeh, you are such a treat! :smile:
 
  • #120
If i didnt know better.. id say Math Is Hard is hitting on me..

still can't get that image of Evo in bunny slippers tho..

hmm.. I'm going to go contemplate this out loud
 
  • #121
cronxeh said:
still can't get that image of Evo in bunny slippers tho..
Agreed. That's just about enough to put you off rabbit stew for life. :eek:
 
  • #122
Danger said:
Agreed. That's just about enough to put you off rabbit stew for life. :eek:


mmm, stew.
 
  • #123
franznietzsche said:
mmm, stew.
I know that there has to be a witty response to that, but I just can't find it. Sorry. :redface:
 
  • #124
Evo said:
I do believe you hold the record for most prolific poster. :bugeye:
You have got to be kidding! I only have 52 (not counting this one). Your own gorgeous self has more than 1,500 and Ivan... that bugger has more than 100 times as many as me!
 
  • #125
Danger said:
You have got to be kidding! I only have 52 (not counting this one). Your own gorgeous self has more than 1,500 and Ivan... that bugger has more than 100 times as many as me!

That means you've actually ventured out of GD 52 times. The posts in here don't show up on your post count. :-p
 
  • #126
Danger said:
You have got to be kidding! I only have 52 (not counting this one). Your own gorgeous self has more than 1,500 and Ivan... that bugger has more than 100 times as many as me!
52 is only the number of times you have posted "outside" of GD. :-p
 
  • #127
Evo said:
52 is only the number of times you have posted "outside" of GD. :-p
I'm not sure that I understand. Do you mean like when I go to GP and answer some kid's question about cars or something? :confused:
 
  • #128
Danger said:
I'm not sure that I understand. Do you mean like when I go to GP and answer some kid's question about cars or something? :confused:
No, posts made here in this forum "General Discussion" do not show up as your post number under your name. They are not counted.

You have made around 2,500 posts since you joined at the end of last month. :bugeye: Most of which were in the last two weeks.
 
  • #129
Danger said:
I'm not sure that I understand. Do you mean like when I go to GP and answer some kid's question about cars or something? :confused:

Yes (10 chars)
 
  • #130
Evo said:
You have made around 2,500 posts since you joined at the end of last month. :bugeye: Most of which were in the last two weeks.
Cripes! I thought it seemed like more than 50, but I really don't have much sense of numbers. No bloody wonder I have no fingerprints left. (To be fair, though, at least two or three hundred of those were Lucy.) :redface:

As long as I have your attention on technical matters, though, I have a couple of other questions. I posted a response to the calculator thread. Since I don't know how to make a link, I just typed out the address of a web site. When I looked back at it, it was a link. How'd that happen?

Secondly, is there a simple way to tell me how to put a picture in?
 
  • #131
Evo said:
No, posts made here in this forum "General Discussion" do not show up as your post number under your name. They are not counted.

You have made around 2,500 posts since you joined at the end of last month. :bugeye: Most of which were in the last two weeks.

How can you tell?

I really want to know what my real post count is...I'm curious.
 
  • #132
franznietzsche said:
I'm curious.
Yellow? (Naw... that's probably way too obscure.) :rolleyes:
 
  • #133
Danger said:
Yellow? (Naw... that's probably way too obscure.) :rolleyes:

What are you talking about now?
 
  • #134
franznietzsche said:
What are you talking about now?
A movie. Considered quite daring for its time...
 
  • #135
Danger said:
A movie. Considered quite daring for its time...


you mean bambi?
 
  • #136
franznietzsche said:
you mean bambi?
Did you get dropped on your head a lot as a kid? :-p "I Am Curious–Yellow" Swedish, 1967.
 
  • #137
Danger said:
Did you get dropped on your head a lot as a kid? :-p "I Am Curious–Yellow" Swedish, 1967.


Swedish.

Nope, wouldn't have seen it.
 
  • #138
franznietzsche said:
Swedish.
It was a mainstream release over here, subtitled. If you don't mind your soft semi-porn in B&W, the video's available. :biggrin:
 
  • #139
Danger said:
It was a mainstream release over here, subtitled. If you don't mind your soft semi-porn in B&W, the video's available. :biggrin:

I'm a guy, porn doesn't bother me in the least.

but renting a movie involves so much getting up. Try to remember it the next time I'm around such a venue.
 
Back
Top