Is There Evidence of a Type Ia Supernova Formed via the Single Degenerate Mode?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chronos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Supernova
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a paper presenting evidence for a Type Ia supernova formed via the single degenerate mode, challenging the prevailing double degenerate model. This particular supernova is classified as subluminous, which complicates its use as a standard candle due to its distance and the difficulty in detecting companion stars. The conversation highlights the emergence of sub-Chandrasekhar Type Iax supernovae, which exhibit distinct characteristics, including lower ejecta velocities and different absolute magnitudes compared to typical Type Ia supernovae. The paper in question notes that the iPTF14atg supernova shares similarities with SN 2002cx but lacks ejecta velocity data. Overall, the findings suggest that a significant portion of Type Ia supernovae may actually be sub-Chandrasekhar Type Iax events.
Chronos
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
11,420
Reaction score
751
This paper - http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.05158, Strong Ultraviolet Pulse From a Newborn Type Ia Supernova- discusses the first well established evidence of a type Ia supernova formed via the single degenerate mode. The double degenerate mode has gained considerable support over the past decade or so given the lack of evidence of any surviving companion star after an SNIa event. The single degenerate mode suffers the undeniable [and fortuitous] handicap that SNIa are generally too distant to permit detection of any surviving companion stars. It appears this particular SNIa belongs to a class of subluminous SNIa that are generally not relied upon as standard candles, although potential cosmological implications are not really addressed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
Chronos said:
This paper - http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.05158, Strong Ultraviolet Pulse From a Newborn Type Ia Supernova- discusses the first well established evidence of a type Ia supernova formed via the single degenerate mode. The double degenerate mode has gained considerable support over the past decade or so given the lack of evidence of any surviving companion star after an SNIa event. The single degenerate mode suffers the undeniable [and fortuitous] handicap that SNIa are generally too distant to permit detection of any surviving companion stars. It appears this particular SNIa belongs to a class of subluminous SNIa that are generally not relied upon as standard candles, although potential cosmological implications are not really addressed.
I wish the paper had included information concerning the velocity of the ejecta. Subluminous, or sub-Chandrasekhar, type Ia SNe are a relatively newly discovered phenomena. A new classification of SNe was proposed two years ago in order to distinguish them from the stereotypical Chandrasekhar type Ia SNe. The proposed new type Iax SNe have characteristics that allow us to easily distinguish between the two. For example, the ejecta velocity of all type Iax SNe is less than 8,000 km/s, the absolute visual magnitude varies between -14.2 and -18.9, and they have the same light-curve shape as SN 2002cx (which the paper you posted also references). All type Ia SNe have an ejecta velocity greater than 10,000 km/s and less than ~30,000 km/s, and have an absolute visual magnitude of -19.3.

According to the paper you posted, the iPTF14atg SN had an absolute magnitude of -17.9 and a similar light-curve shape as SN 2002cx, but it does not include information concerning the ejecta velocity. It is estimated that approximately 31% of all type Ia SNe are actually sub-Chandrasekhar type Iax SNe.

Type Iax Supernovae: A New Class of Stellar Explosion - The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 767, Number 1, Published March 25, 2013 (free issue)
 
Last edited:
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
Back
Top