Superposition irreducible representation

parsikoo
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Do Lorentz Transformations or their products having irreducible representation, and is superposition allowed or special consideration are needed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what you're asking. Trying posing your question in a different way.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'

Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'

1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
View full post »

Thread '1-Way Speed of Light'

Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
View full post »

Thread 'A sufficient condition for integrability of equation ##\nabla g=0##'

In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
View full post »

Similar threads

I How to derive irreducible representations/tensors?
Replies
22
Views
3K
I Irreducible Representations of EM-Tensor Under Spatial Rotations
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Why are direct sums of Lorentz group representations important in physics?
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Lorentz Group: Tensor Representation Explained
Replies
4
Views
2K
I What do we mean when we say something transforms "under"....
Replies
4
Views
2K
A Show Lagrangian is invariant under a Lorentz transformation without using generators
Replies
3
Views
1K
I Tensor decomposition, Sym representations and irreps.
Replies
1
Views
1K
A Does an irreducible representation acting on operators imply....
Replies
3
Views
2K
A Transformation law of the energy momentum tensor
Replies
9
Views
3K
I Irreducible representations of the Dn group
Replies
3
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top