Superposition of Electric Potential problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the total electric potential energy of a system with three charges: -q, +2q, and +3q. Participants clarify the necessity of calculating electric potentials between each pair of charges, emphasizing the correct use of formulas for potential energy and potential. The confusion arises regarding the signs of the potential values, particularly why the potential between two positive charges is positive despite the transition from lower to higher potential. Ultimately, the correct total electric potential energy is derived, incorporating both attractive and repulsive interactions among the charges. Understanding the proper formulas and their applications is key to resolving the confusion in calculations.
Lo.Lee.Ta.
Messages
217
Reaction score
0
1. A system consists of the charges -q at (-d,0), +2q at (d,0), and +3q at (0,d). What is the total electric potential energy of the system.

2. I'm wondering, is it necessary to calculate each electric potential between charges from lower electron potential to higher electron potential?

-V-q to +3q = \frac{k(-q)}{\sqrt{2}d} + \frac{k(+3q)}{\sqrt{2}d}

V= -\frac{2kq}{\sqrt{2}d}



-V-q to +2q = \frac{k(-q)}{2d} + \frac{k(+2q)}{2d}

V= -\frac{kq}{2d}



-V+2q to +3q = \frac{k(+2q)}{\sqrt{2}d} + \frac{k(+3q)}{\sqrt{2}d}

V= -\frac{5kq}{2d}


The book solution says this last V should equal positive \frac{k(2q)(3q)}{\sqrt{2}d}...
But more simplified, that would equal: 6q2k/\sqrt{2}d

So, how did they get this? And- why is it positive?


I thought that if we have low electric potential to high electric potential, then ΔV= (-)

(Va - Vb = ΔV = low - high = a NEGATIVE number)

In the first 2 calculations, we went from -q to +2q and -q to +3q.
So this means we went from LOW potential to HIGH potential. So it would make sense that these two V values are negative.

But the third also goes from lower to higher potential (+2q to +3q)... So why isn't this one also negative...?

#=_= So confused. :confused:

Please help? Thanks! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, to find the electric potential due to two charges q and Q separated by a distance r, you need to use the equation:

Vq,Q = \frac{kqQ}{r}

To get the total electric potential you need to add up the electric potentials from each pair of charges. So for the last one you can see that it would in fact be what the book says. This is because both charges are positive. It doesn't matter in what order you calculate them, you will be adding them all up. So:

Vnet = V1,2 + V1,3 + V2,3
 
Oh, wow!

My problem was not using the right formula! :P

Formula for electric potential energy between charges: Uq,Q = (kqQ)/r


Formula for electric potential between charges: Vq,Q = \frac{kq}{x} + \frac{kQ}{(x2)-x}

Let me know if I have this right, please:
If I have 2 charges (q at x=5 and Q at x=20), and I want to know the electric potential between them, I would say:
Vq,Q=\frac{kq}{5} + \frac{kQ}{20-5}

Is this the right expression?


Alright, back to my orginial problem...
Total electric potential energy of system:

Utotal = \frac{-kq(2q)}{2d} + \frac{-kq(3q)}{\sqrt{2}d} + \frac{k(2q)(3q)}{\sqrt{2}d}

Utotal = \frac{3kq^2}{\sqrt{2}d} - \frac{kq^2}{d}

Thanks for the help! :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top