Superposition of two wavefunctions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the superposition of two wavefunctions, specifically addressing the arithmetic of complex numbers involved in the calculation. The main equation used is |\psi|^{2}=\psi\psi^{*}, but the user encounters a discrepancy in their results, obtaining a more complex expression than expected. They seek clarification on how their result relates to the simplified form provided in their notes. A reference to complex number properties is shared to assist in understanding the calculations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying complex arithmetic in quantum mechanics.
Leb
Messages
87
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Superposition of two wavefunctions

Homework Statement


The problem is more of complex number arithmetic more then conceptual :
Superposition.jpg



Homework Equations



|\psi|^{2}=\psi\psi^{*}

The Attempt at a Solution



I simply used the equation given above, but instead of getting 2Re{...} I get :

|\psi_{1}||\psi_{2}| \left( c_{1}c_{2}^{*}\exp({i(\alpha_{1}-\alpha_{2})})+c_{1}^{*}c_{2}\exp({-i(\alpha_{1}-\alpha_{2})})\right)

Could someone explain how is this equal to that given in the notes I attached ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Leb said:

Homework Statement


The problem is more of complex number arithmetic more then conceptual : View attachment 44717


Homework Equations



|\psi|^{2}=\psi\psi^{*}

The Attempt at a Solution



I simply used the equation given above, but instead of getting 2Re{...} I get :

|\psi_{1}||\psi_{2}| \left( c_{1}c_{2}^{*}\exp({i(\alpha_{1}-\alpha_{2})})+c_{1}^{*}c_{2}\exp({-i(\alpha_{1}-\alpha_{2})})\right)

Could someone explaind how is this equal to that given in the notes I attached ?


The following link should be helpful:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_number#Conjugation
 
Great, thanks !
 
Leb said:
Great, thanks !

Glad to help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top