Supersymmetric particles generated?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shalayka
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particles
shalayka
Messages
125
Reaction score
0
http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/Dark-matter-City-scientist-claims-breakthrough/293784/

This article from yesterday (April 7, 2008) is a bit hard to follow, but it states:

"He and his team have created new fundamental particles in the lab that may have existed at the time of Big Bang, the creation of the Universe. The team is busy analysing the properties of the particles. It is presumed that these particles known as super symmetric particles constitute the mysterious "Dark Matter"."

Has anyone heard of anything related to this research? Did they actually create supersymmetric particles at Fermilab?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think this is just another case of bad science journalism, which is more or less everywhere.

There ARE signs of SUSY in some standard model transitions---for example the b->s gamma operator receives contributions from SUSY particles generically, and it is a classic SUSY signature. The measurement used to be SMALLER than the SM prediction, which means that SUSY was very tightly constrained. The SM calculation was repreformed about a year ago, and the measurement is now ABOVE the prediction (by something like 2 sigma, which isn't good enough to claim discovery). There are also a few other signatures that people have been excited about lately---g-2 of the muon, for example (though this measurement is tough to fit with the simplest SUSY models).
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top