Suppose I inflate a balloon on the moon and then let it go. What would

• dirk_mec1
In summary, the balloon would fly away faster on the moon than on Earth because the pressure difference is larger on the moon.
dirk_mec1
Suppose I inflate a balloon on the moon and then let it go. What would happen?

Would it:

1) slowly release air and fall to the ground of the moon

or

2) release air faster and fly away faster than on earthMy answer:
I reasoned that the key to this question is the pressure difference, for the balloon will fly away because of an overpressure, correct? Now because the overpressure is larger than on the moon and because of an absence of air answer 2 is correct? Am I right?

dirk_mec1 said:
Suppose I inflate a balloon on the moon and then let it go. What would happen?

Would it:

1) slowly release air and fall to the ground of the moon

or

2) release air faster and fly away faster than on earth

I reasoned that the key to this question is the pressure difference, for the balloon will fly away because of an overpressure, correct? Now because the overpressure is larger than on the moon and because of an absence of air answer 2 is correct? Am I right?

Air will rush out of the open nozzle of the balloon, and the balloon will fly off in the other direction. How fast it goes will depend on the velocity of air coming out. You'll need a little bit less air to inflate the balloon because there's no pressure from outside. I suspect the balloon might be a bit faster on the Moon because there's no air resistance, but I think the exit velocity of the air should be pretty similar to Earth. The pressure difference for a given balloon size should be about the same.

Once all the air is out, the deflated balloon will follow a parabolic path the same as a rock back to the ground.

Cheers -- sylas

I believe it will fly away much faster on the moon than on the earth. Air resistance on Earth for something as weak and big as a balloon is a huge deal.

So I'm wrong that the main reason for going faster it the pressure difference? I thought that the reason the balloon releases air faster was due to the pressure difference which is larger on the moon than on earth.

If you were with Neil Armstrong in 1969 and if you released the baloon after your hatch opened, the baloon would 'blow up' to an enormous size, then take off in a direction that's opposite the baloon's orifice.
It may also happen that the baloon will blow up to such a large radius that it may burst before it even has a chance to take flight. To find out for sure, determine the pressure the baloon's rubber can withstand, per square inch. Multiply this by the square inch surface area of the baloon. The rubber will have some kind of constant ('rebound constant') that tells you how quickly this rubber can 'snap back' to its original shape after undergoing shear strain, allowing you to determine the rate at which the air will leave the orifice of the baloon for a known orifice diameter. If the rubber can't exhale all of its air while staying below its rebound constant, it will pop. If it can, then it will, as previously stated, become very large, float away while releasing its air, then drop to the ground as a flat baloon when all air is released.

Neo_Anderson said:
If you were with Neil Armstrong in 1969 and if you released the baloon after your hatch opened,
And if you read my question again you'll find out that I'm inflating he balloon whilst on the moon. So no hatch is involved. But the pressure on the moon itself is much lower than on earth. Apparently I'm don't understand the mechanism involved since I'm keep getting back to the pressure-story.

dirk_mec1 said:
So I'm wrong that the main reason for going faster it the pressure difference? I thought that the reason the balloon releases air faster was due to the pressure difference which is larger on the moon than on earth.
If you inflate the balloon to the same size on the moon as on earth, the pressure difference between inside and outside is exactly the same.

The pressure differential required to inflate the balloon to the same size on the Moon as on Earth is the same.

However, there's less mass in the balloon due to 0 ambient pressure. However, there's also no backpressure at the nozzle, just as there is no air friction. Therefore, I've a hunch the balloon will accelerate faster, due to the lower mass and higher exit velocity while retaining the same intermal/external pressure ration, and encountering no air friction, the latter two issues which, each and of themselves would result in greater acceleration, all factors being equal, but, when combined, eclipse the first factor.

Well, it's just a hunch, but it's quite a good run-on sentence, don't you think? LoL...

How about this expriement? You blow up the balloon, then tie off the nozzle. Then you drop the balloon and a hammer from the same height at the same time. On the moon, they both land at the same time, on the earth, the large amount of drag on the balloon causes it to reach a slow terminal velocity in a matter of inches from the release point, and the hammer lands first.

Back to the OP, the balloon released with an untied nozzle on the moon is going to take off like a small rocket because there's no aerodynamic drag.

dirk_mec1 said:
And if you read my question again you'll find out that I'm inflating he balloon whilst on the moon. So no hatch is involved. But the pressure on the moon itself is much lower than on earth. Apparently I'm don't understand the mechanism involved since I'm keep getting back to the pressure-story.

And what makes you think Neil Armstrong wasn't on the moon when he opened the hatch, stepped on the surface of... Ummm... that huge thing in the nighttime sky that gives us the tides, and said that it was "One small step for man..."?

Anyway. A baloon that's inflated on the moon and in its vacuum will have the same pressure as one on the earth, provided they are both inflated to the same volume.
Snce it takes far fewer air molecules to inflate the baloon on the moon (provided it's being blown-up in vacuo) to the same diameter as that baloon that's on the earth, the baloon on the moon will have far less 'fuel' (air) for it to scoot along.
The moon's lower gravity does not have a significant impact on the length the baloon will travel.
The absence of an atmosphere on the moon can also be mitigated by using a narrow baloon, meaning we can lower the impact of atmospheric drag for the baloon that's released on earth.

Therefore, the baloon on the Earth will travel considerably farther than the one on the moon.

doogle1

Neo_Anderson said:
And what makes you think Neil Armstrong wasn't on the moon when he opened the hatch, stepped on the surface of... Ummm... that huge thing in the nighttime sky that gives us the tides, and said that it was "One small step for man..."?
Well...I do think neil was there.
Anyway. A baloon that's inflated on the moon and in its vacuum will have the same pressure as one on the earth, provided they are both inflated to the same volume.
Ok, so this agrees what other people say in this thread, the pressure difference is the same.

Snice it takes far fewer air molecules to inflate the baloon on the moon (provided it's being blown-up in vacuo) to the same diameter as that baloon that's on the earth, the baloon on the moon will have far less 'fuel' (air) for it to scoot along.
So the mass of the balloon is smaller than on Earth given that both balloons have the same volume?

The moon's lower gravity does not have a significant impact on the length the baloon will travel.
The absence of an atmosphere on the moon can also be mitigated by using a narrow baloon, meaning we can lower the impact of atmospheric drag for the baloon that's released on earth.
So gravity doesn't has much influence because the mass difference is small but the air resistance is the key factor, right?

dirk_mec1 said:
So the mass of the balloon is smaller than on Earth given that both balloons have the same volume?
No, the mass of the baloon remains unchanged. The mass of the air in the baloon + the mass of the baloon itself is less on the moon than it is on earth, for baloons blown up to equal volumes.
So gravity doesn't has much influence because the mass difference is small but the air resistance is the key factor, right?
Correct. It's all dependent on applied materials. Compare a baloon made with Rubber X which is a 'space-age' rubber that's both feather-light and robust, with Rubber Y which is just your ordinary vulcanized rubber--the stuff of bicycle inner tubes. Both can be used in our earth/moon experiment, but for the former (Rubber X), gravity isn't a factor in propultion distance, whereas gravity is a factor in propultion distance with Rubber Y.
Air resistance is a significant factor because at sea-level, there's so much compressed air that we can do things like fly helicopters and other aircraft.

Ok, the answers are in it seems that Neo anderson explanation was the only and correct answer!

mugaliens said:
There's also no backpressure at the nozzle, just as there is no air friction. Therefore, I've a hunch the balloon will accelerate faster, due to the lower mass and higher exit velocity.

Neo_Anderson said:
Snce it takes far fewer air molecules to inflate the baloon on the moon (provided it's being blown-up in vacuo) to the same diameter as that baloon that's on the earth, the baloon on the moon will have far less 'fuel' (air) for it to scoot along.

The absence of an atmosphere on the moon can also be mitigated by using a narrow baloon, meaning we can lower the impact of atmospheric drag for the baloon that's released on earth.
This ignores the fact that the atmosphere greatly reduces the effective exhaust velocity of the air expelled out the nozzle of the balloon (compared to the moon case), which greatly reduces the specific impulse (impulse per unit of mass expelled). Also the effect on terminal velocity of the greater mass is related to the log of the mass ratios, while directly related to the effective exhaust velocity.

Even if the narrow balloon was housed in a non-deforming, very low drag, container to reduce the drag, it's my guess that the reduction of specific impulse at sea level is larger than the reduction of mass of the air contained by the balloon on the moon, and so the balloon on the moon achieves a higher terminal velocity when it's air runs out. In formula form:

VE = effective exhaust velocity
M0 = initial mass of balloon and air
M1 = final mass of balloon after air expelled
terminal velocity = VE ln(M0/M1)

VEmoon ln(M0moon/M1) > VEearth ln(M0earth/M1)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specific_impulse

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsiolkovsky_rocket_equation

Last edited:

1. What would happen to the balloon on the moon?

The balloon would not float upwards as it would on Earth, but it would still expand until it reached its maximum size due to the lack of atmospheric pressure on the moon. Once released, it would quickly deflate as there is no air resistance to keep it inflated.

2. Would the balloon pop on the moon?

No, the balloon would not pop on the moon as there is no air to create pressure and burst the balloon. It would simply deflate due to the lack of atmospheric pressure.

3. How would the balloon behave differently on the moon compared to Earth?

The balloon would behave differently on the moon due to the absence of gravity and atmosphere. It would not float upwards or pop like it would on Earth and would instead expand until it reached its maximum size and then deflate once released.

4. Can I inflate a balloon on the moon without a pump?

Yes, you can inflate a balloon on the moon without a pump as the lack of air pressure allows for easy inflation by simply blowing into the balloon. However, the balloon may not hold its shape for long due to the lack of atmospheric pressure.

5. Would the balloon still be affected by the moon's gravity?

Yes, the balloon would still be affected by the moon's gravity, but since the moon's gravity is only about one-sixth of Earth's, the balloon would not fall to the ground as quickly as it would on Earth. It would still eventually fall due to the pull of the moon's gravity, but at a slower rate.

• Mechanics
Replies
17
Views
2K
• Mechanics
Replies
26
Views
2K
• Mechanics
Replies
9
Views
2K
• Mechanics
Replies
19
Views
1K
• Mechanics
Replies
11
Views
2K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
726
• Mechanics
Replies
13
Views
9K
• Mechanics
Replies
10
Views
146
• Classical Physics
Replies
99
Views
3K
• Mechanics
Replies
4
Views
18K