Surface area dependence of radiative heat transfer

AI Thread Summary
Radiative transfer from a body is primarily dependent on its surface area rather than its volume, as described by Stefan's law, which states that the emitted radiation is proportional to the surface area and the fourth power of temperature. The electromagnetic radiation originates from vibrating charges within the body, which are influenced by volume; however, the net emission is determined by the surface area because the surface layer emits radiation while also absorbing from deeper layers. In ideal black bodies, this approximation holds as the thin surface layer effectively manages emission and absorption. For non-ideal black bodies, while deeper layers contribute to emission, the effects tend to cancel out, reinforcing the surface area's dominance in radiative transfer. Understanding this relationship is crucial for accurately modeling thermal radiation behavior.
Karthiksrao
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Hi all

I was just wondering about the dependence of radiative transfer from a body, on its surface area and not the volume. As per stefan's law, the variation is (StefanConstant * SurfaceArea* Temp^4)

The primary source of these electromagnetic radiation is from the charges in the body that are vibrating at a particular temperature. And the amount of charge would obviously depend on the volume of the body. Higher the volume, you would expect more charges to be vibrating, and hence higher would be the emitted radiation.

If that be the case, why is the net radiative transfer dependent on the surface area of the body and not the volume ?

Any thoughts ?
Thanks a lot!
 
Science news on Phys.org
Stefan's law is an approximation of 'ideal black body' - the body having so large amount of various vibrating charges, that very thin (infinitesimaly thin) layer of that body emits all that radiation, but, at the same time, it absorbs radiation emitted from deeper layers.

If you take not so perfectly black body - then you'll have some emission coming from deeper parts of the body, as the surface layer is not able to absorb all the light from deeper layers. But, on the other hand, every layer also emits less. Effectively, those effect cancel, so black body idealisation may be used as an approximation.
 
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
11K
Replies
43
Views
8K
Back
Top