Surface Area Multiple Integrals problem

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving surface area problems using multiple integrals. The first problem involves finding the area of a surface defined by a vector equation, where the correct approach includes calculating partial derivatives and using the cross product to determine the area. The second problem concerns a surface above a triangular region, where the same principles apply, and the integration limits are defined by the triangle's vertices. The participants clarify their calculations, ultimately confirming that the area for the first problem is √107. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correct parametrization and integration techniques in solving these types of problems.
Zonda
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I need some help on these problems. I'm not sure what to do.

1 Find the area of the plane with vector equation r(u, v) =< 1+v, u-2v, 3-5u+v> that is given by 0<u<1, 0<v<1.

So far, I took the partial derivatives with respect to u and v. I don't know if I was supposed to or not and I'm really stuck there.

Since I'm trying to find surface area a relevant equation may be S = (double integral) SQRT(1 + (partial derivative of u)^2 + (partial derivative of v)^2) dA

2. The part of the surface z = 1 + 3x +2y^2 that lies above the triangle with vertices (0,0), (0,1), (2,1)

Relevant equation should be same as above.

I think I got the answer but I'm not sure and would really appreciate some help if I got it wrong.
Here's how I did it:
partial x: 3 Partial y: 4y
The boundary of the triangle is x=2y
so it took the integral from 0 to 1 and from 0 to 2y SQRT(10 + 16y^2)dx dy
and I got the integral from 0 to 1 times 2y SQRT(10 +16y^2) dy
then I took that integral and got (2/3)*(2/32)*SQRT(10 + 16Y^2)^(3/2) from 0 to 1
My final answer is (1/24)(26)^(3/2) - (1/24)(10)^(3/2)

Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that when you parametrize a surface, tangent vectors are gained by differentiating with respect to the two independent variables.
Let us take the general case.

Suppose you have a surface S parametrized as
\vec{S}(u,v)=(X(u,v),Y(u,v),Z(u,v))
Then, two infinitesemal tangent vectors to this surface are given by:
d\vec{t}_{u}=\frac{\partial\vec{S}}{\partial{u}}du,d\vec{t}_{v}=\frac{\partial\vec{S}}{\partial{v}}dv
The differential area spanned by these two vectors lies on S, and its area is given by:
dA=||d\vec{n}_{S}||=||d\vec{t}_{u}\times{d}\vec{t}_{v}||=||\frac{\partial\vec{S}}{\partial{u}}\times\frac{\partial\vec{S}}{\partial{v}}||dudv
And the total area of S is then gained by summing together all dA's (i.e, by integration).

Thus, yes, you have thought correctly on 1.
 
The answer I got for number 1 is SQRT (107), is this correct?

What about number 2?
 
Hmm..I have to retract what I said about you having thought correctly on 1.

What you have written is totally meaningless!

Follow what I wrote in my post:
\frac{\partial\vec{r}}{\partial{u}}=\vec{j}-5\vec{k},\frac{\partial\vec{r}}{\partial{v}}=\vec{i}-2\vec{j}+\vec{k}
Thus, the norm of the cross product is:
||\frac{\partial\vec{r}}{\partial{u}}\times\frac{\partial\vec{r}}{\partial{v}}||=\sqrt{62}
and since both u and v varies between 0 and 1, \sqrt{62} is the correct answer.
 
I still get SQRT (107). Are you sure about SQRT(62)?
 
Hmm..perhaps not. Made a too fast calculation. Sorry about that. square root of 107 it is.
 
Thanks! What about number 2?
 
arildno said:
Hmm..I have to retract what I said about you having thought correctly on 1.

What you have written is totally meaningless!

Follow what I wrote in my post:
\frac{\partial\vec{r}}{\partial{u}}=\vec{j}-5\vec{k},\frac{\partial\vec{r}}{\partial{v}}=\vec{i}-2\vec{j}+\vec{k}
Thus, the norm of the cross product is:
||\frac{\partial\vec{r}}{\partial{u}}\times\frac{\partial\vec{r}}{\partial{v}}||=\sqrt{62}
and since both u and v varies between 0 and 1, \sqrt{62} is the correct answer.
?
\left|\begin{array}{ccc}i &amp; j &amp; k \\ 0 &amp; 1 &amp; -5 \\ 1 &amp; -2 &amp; 1\end{array}\right|= i\left|\begin{array}{cc}1 &amp; -5 \\ -2 &amp; 1\end{array}\right|- j\left|\begin{array}{cc}0 &amp; -5 \\1 &amp; 1\end{array}\right|+ k\left|\begin{array}{cc} 0 &amp; 1 \\ 1 &amp; -2\end{array}\right|
= -9 i- 5j - k
which has length \sqrt{81+25+1}= \sqrt{107}
 
Indeed, it is.
However, as I made the mental calculation (-5)*(-2)=-5, so that the i'th component became -6 rather than -9, I got 62 as my radicand rather than 107.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
You are starting to take after me. That is NOT a good sign!
 
  • #11
Yes, the answer to (1) is \sqrt{107}

For (2): The part of the surface z = 1 + 3x +2y^2 that lies above the triangle with vertices (0,0), (0,1), (2,1)

Pretty much the same thing. You can write this as x= u, y= v, z= 1+ 3u+ 2v2, basically using x and y as parameters, so that r= ui+ vj+ (1+ 3u+ 2v2)k. Find ru, rv[/sup] and take their cross product. Integrate over the triangle (which has sides x= 0, y= 1, and y= (1/2)x).
 
  • #12
Another way for 1:

The surface you're looking for is a parallelogram with vertices at r(0,0), r(1,0), r(0,1) and r(1,1). So two of its non-parallel sides are given by r(1,0)-r(0,0) and r(0,1)-r(0,0). Find the norm of the cross product of these two vectors:

|| [r(1,0)-r(0,0)] x [r(0,1)-r(0,0)] ||

and this will be the desired area.
 
  • #13
Thanks for your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K