Surface Charge of Uniformly charged sphere

teroenza
Messages
190
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


In the section on the discontinuity of the electric field (Griffiths introduction to electrodynamics) there is the following.

"Where there is no surface charge, the perpendicular component of the electric field (to the surface) is continuous, as for instance at the surface of a uniformly charged solid sphere.

This is as opposed to being discontinuous, by σ/ε_0 when a surface charge exists

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


If it was a conducting sphere, I would understand that if it was neutral, there would be no net charge on the surface, but I do not see why it has to be the case here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It doesn't say the sphere is conducting. A "uniformly charged sphere" means the charge density in each part of the sphere is the same. A conducting sphere can't be that. All of the charge would move to the surface.
 
Ok. But because it is uniformly charged, there is presumably a nonzero charge density on the surface (as elsewhere) and thus charge on the surface.

I just don't understand why the surface of a uniformly charged solid sphere has no charge on it. That is contradictory. I'm not sure if I am not understanding the physics or the words.

Why is "...surface of a uniformly charged solid sphere." and example of a place ""Where there is no surface charge'''?
 
teroenza said:
Ok. But because it is uniformly charged, there is presumably a nonzero charge density on the surface (as elsewhere) and thus charge on the surface.

I just don't understand why the surface of a uniformly charged solid sphere has no charge on it. That is contradictory. I'm not sure if I am not understanding the physics or the words.

Why is "...surface of a uniformly charged solid sphere." and example of a place ""Where there is no surface charge'''?

You misunderstand what 'surface charge' is. Surface charge is (ideally) a finite amount of charge contained in an infinitely thin layer, the surface. It's a useful idealization to make for a conducting sphere which has no charge in the interior and all of its charge very close to the surface. Very different from a 'uniformly charged sphere'.
 
Last edited:
teroenza said:
Ok. But because it is uniformly charged, there is presumably a nonzero charge density on the surface (as elsewhere) and thus charge on the surface.

I just don't understand why the surface of a uniformly charged solid sphere has no charge on it. That is contradictory. I'm not sure if I am not understanding the physics or the words.

Why is "...surface of a uniformly charged solid sphere." and example of a place ""Where there is no surface charge'''?

Imagine the surface as a shell of one atom (molecule) thick. The radius of an atom is about 10-10 m. How much is the charge of the shell compared to the charge of a sphere of radius R=0.1 m?

In case of a metal, all charge accumulates in that surface shell.

ehild
 
##|\Psi|^2=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\exp(\frac{-(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##\braket{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\,x\exp(-\frac{(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##y=x-x_0 \quad x=y+x_0 \quad dy=dx.## The boundaries remain infinite, I believe. ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dy(y+x_0)\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2}).## ##\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,y\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2})+\frac{2x_0}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,\exp(-\frac{y^2}{b^2}).## I then resolved the two...
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top