Surface Integral: Transform, Calculate and Add Up Results?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the evaluation of surface integrals, particularly the transformation of these integrals from a surface element dS to a simpler area element in the x-y-plane, and whether calculations should also be performed for other planes like dxdz and dydz. Participants explore the implications of projection and the relationships between different surface elements.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that surface integrals can be transformed into integrals in the x-y-plane, suggesting that this may be sufficient for evaluation.
  • Others argue that the choice of projection surface is crucial, indicating that one should project onto the plane that simplifies the integral, typically the x-y-plane.
  • A participant clarifies that when evaluating a double integral of the form doub_int[f(x,y) dS], the calculation should indeed be performed in the x-y-plane.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between the surface element da and the area element dA, providing a formula that relates the two through the derivatives of the surface function.
  • Additionally, a participant introduces the concept of representing a surface in terms of parameters u and v, discussing the fundamental vector product and its role in determining the differential of surface area.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of projecting the surface onto the x-y-plane for simplification, but there is no consensus on whether calculations for other planes (dxdz, dydz) are necessary or how they should be handled.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on the choice of projection surface and the assumptions made regarding the surface's representation. The discussion does not resolve whether additional calculations for other planes are required.

coverband
Messages
170
Reaction score
1
As you know surface integrals are integrated with respect to dS. We then tranform the integral into one in dxdy. Is this the end of the problem or must we calculate it for dxdz and dydz as well and if so do you add up all results at the end!?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can do it several ways. If you have some arbitrary surface, the trick is to project the surface to some simpler surface, for example the x-y-plane. With projection we have simpler integral in which we use dA, dA being infinitesimal surface element on our simpler surface, for example on the x-y-plane the area element is dx*dy (could be r dr d\phi if we used polar cordinates).

You asked wether we calculate it for dxdz or dydz, the answer is: you have to use the plane on which the surface is projected on. If we have some surface f(x,y), we project it on the x-y-plane and this is almost always the case. So we have to evaluate only one integral, in this case one with dxdy.
 
Just to clarify...

Thanks for reply


Just to clarify, if asked to evaluate
doub_int[f(x,y) dS]

We just solve in xy plane?

Thanks again...
 
Yes. Solve in x-y-plane. But the most important thing to remember is the projection! Let da be surface element on f(x,y) and dA a surface element on x-y-plane. Then we have a relation da = dA \sqrt{\frac{\partial f(x,y)}{\partial x}^2 + \frac{\partial f(x,y)}{\partial y}^2 +1} (follows from the cosine of the angle between the surface normal and the x-y-plane normal). So when you're doing the surface integral you get \int f(x,y)da = \int f(x,y) \sqrt{\frac{\partial f(x,y)}{\partial x}^2 + \frac{\partial f(x,y)}{\partial y}^2 +1} dA. For only the surface area you have similar formula, you just have \int da and so on.
 
More generally, one can have a surface in terms of any 2 parameters. If x= x(u,v), y= y(u,v), z= z(u,v), then we can write the "position vector" of any point on the surface as
x(u,v)\vec{i}+ y(u,v)\vec{j}+ z(u,v)\vec{k}.

The two derivatives \vec{r}_u= x_u\vec{i}+ y_u\vec{j}+ z_u\vec{k} and \vec{r}_v= x_v\vec{i}+ y_v\vec{j}+ z_v\vec{k} lie in the tangent plane and their lengths are the differentials of length in that direction. Their cross product, \vec{r}_u\times\vec{r}_v is called the "fundamental vector product" and its length, times dudv, is the differential of surface area.

In particular, if z= f(x,y), this gives exactly what JukkaVayrynen said.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K